Answer:
C. Beneficial
Explanation:
As Qing was upset about meeting with the lawyers where they could see risks everywhere and were very good at arguing their position. She strongly believed in her proposal. But after a long meeting, Qing and the lawyers worked out new contract language addressing each risk that they identified. In the end, the conflict was beneficial because both parties reached to some productive conclusion at the end and it was win-win situation for both parties. This conflict encouraged both parties in coming up with a solution on which both partied happily agreed as well and hence this conflict was proved fruitful.
Answer: It only focused on brand competitors
Explanation:
The options to the question are:
A) It idenfied the wrong brand competitors.
B) It was too obsessed with market dominance.
C) It only focused on brand competitors.
D) It didn't engage in competitive analysis.
E) It refused to collaborate with its competitors.
From the question, we are informed that Kodak focused on maintaining market dominance over Polaroid and Fuji but failed to consider Sony, Nikon, Canon, and even smartphones.
The mistake made by Kodak was that it only focused on brand competitors. Kodak failed to realise that firms such as Sony, Nikon, Canon, and even smartphones are competitors as well.
