What lies at the root of Parris character is the idea of binary oppositions. Parris is either convinced that the individual is the agent of Satan or that the person is in accord with him to whatever he does. Parris either view himself as discarded or in total control. Like Salem, he sees the world much in binary oppositions. The quote is relevant to Paaris because there is no complexity or complexed consciousness. He believes either the church will suffer, or he will have complete devotion from his followers. Parris states a distinct line that the one who disputes will be cast into hell or either he will get a total submission from his followers.
Through his statement, he directly attacks the Proctor. Proctor has represented himself opposite, as not an advocate to Parris and that he is not in prescription with the organized religion of the church. To such opposition, Parris forms the base of “either you are with me or against me”. For Parris threat and fear is the sole way to ensure loyalty and faithfulness. Hence, Proctor does not believe in such a way.
As evidence that Fawcett was "a remarkable man," the author shows that he was a very admirable explorer and was part of one of the most important geographical groups in Britain.
This can be seen in the lines:
- "Fawcett [...] as an honored member of Britain's renowned royal geographic society."
- "[...] He'd battle anacondas and electric eels, and how he'd emerge with maps of regions that no one had even came back from."
In this case, we can see that the author used the account of someone who studied Fawcett's life about his great deeds and how he was very good at what he did.
Fawcett was such an extraordinary man that even his disappearance is a curious thing and one that attracts the attention of all who want to know more about him.
In this case, we can say that the author's argument about Fawcett being an incredible man is effective because the author shows evidence to support it.
More information on the use of evidence at the link:
brainly.com/question/37503
Answer:
It gives the reader insight of all of the characters. because the author could be writing what someone is thinking.
