Answer: 1. a. The existence of a no-fault law.
2. d. $17,000
Explanation:
1. For Jane to prove that Famous was indeed negligent, she definitely does not need the No - Fault law. This is a law that is mostly applicable to motor vehicle accidents and means that the individual parties are responsible for whatever injuries they sustain and the person who actually caused the accident is irrelevant. The main aim of this is to reduce the damages claims that one can be put on Insurance which increase insurance premiums.
<em>If this law was to be applied here, Jane would</em> <em>be responsible for her own injuries and her suit would fail. </em>
2. Jane missed 2 weeks of work and in each week she earns $5,000.
She also had medical expenses of $4,000 and estimated pain and suffering of $3,000.
The general damages therefore are the two weeks she missed plus the medical expenses and the pain and suffering.
= 5,000 ( 2) + 4,000 + 3,000
= 10,000 + 7,000
= $17,000
A bank service fee of $10 would be included on the bank reconciliation as on the last day of the bank statement
<h2>What exactly does a bank reconciliation include?</h2>
Starting with the bank's ending cash balance, adding any deposits that are currently being made up of the company to the bank, subtracting any checks that haven't yet been cleared by the bank, then either adding or subtracting any other items completes the basic process flow for a bank reconciliation.
<h3>A bank reconciliation is what?</h3>
At the conclusion of every month, a business should perform a bank reconciliation, which is that the process of confirming the correctness of both the bank statement and the cash accounts.
The most frequent reasons why the ending bank balance and ending book balance of cash differ.
Learn more about bank reconciliation :
brainly.com/question/15525383
#SPJ4
<span>A combination of a big down payment, a longer term loan, and a lower interest rate is expected to result into a low monthly mortgage payment.</span><span />
That is intiative, its basically commiting yourself to doing something and putting everything else behind you
Children aged birth to 18 months do not consistently show safety awareness and cannot reliably demonstrate knowledge of safe choices. So, this statement is true.
<h3>What do you mean by children?</h3>
Children refer to the young human being who is below the age of puberty or below the age of the majority.
Children aged birth to 18 months do not consistently show safety awareness and cannot reliably demonstrate knowledge of safe choices.
Therefore, the above statement is true.
Learn more about children here:
brainly.com/question/11364001
#SPJ1