When Jesus reached the famous well at Shechem and asked a Samaritan woman for a drink, she replied full of surprise: "Jews do not associate with Samaritans” (John 4:9). In the ancient world, relations between Jews and Samaritans were indeed strained. Josephus reports a number of unpleasant events: Samaritans harass Jewish pilgrims traveling through Samaria between Galilee and Judea, Samaritans scatter human bones in the Jerusalem sanctuary, and Jews in turn burn down Samaritan villages. The very notion of “the good Samaritan” (Luke 10:25-37) only makes sense in a context in which Samaritans were viewed with suspicion and hostility by Jews in and around Jerusalem.
It is difficult to know when the enmity first arose in history—or for that matter, when Jews and Samaritans started seeing themselves (and each other) as separate communities. For at least some Jews during the Second Temple period, 2Kgs 17:24-41 may have explained Samaritan identity: they were descendants of pagan tribes settled by the Assyrians in the former <span>northern kingdom </span>of Israel, the region where most Samaritans live even today. But texts like this may not actually get us any closer to understanding the Samaritans’ historical origins.
The Samaritans, for their part, did not accept any scriptural texts beyond the Pentateuch. Scholars have known for a long time about an ancient and distinctly Samaritan version of the Pentateuch—which has been an important source for textual criticism of the Bible for centuries. In fact, a major indication for a growing Samaritan self-awareness in antiquity was the insertion of "typically Samaritan" additions into this version of the Pentateuch, such as a Decalogue commandment to build an altar on Mount Gerizim, which Samaritans viewed as the sole “place of blessing” (see also Deut 11:29, Deut 27:12). They fiercely rejected Jerusalem—which is not mentioned by name in the Pentateuch—and all Jerusalem-related traditions and institutions such as kingship and messianic eschatology.
a state in which supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives, and which has an elected or nominated president rather than a monarch.
the peace which existed between nationalities within the Roman Empire.
government by a dictator.
a large bag made of a strong material such as burlap, thick paper, or plastic, used for storing and carrying goods.
A complex society is characterized by features such as:
- Having large population and its economy is structured according to specialization and a division of labor.
- Large scale agricultural development, which allows members of society time for specialized skill sets.
- Organized political structure.
- Big architectural projects and prescribed burial rites.
Before human beings developed complex societies, they lived in primitive societies. A centralized state government is required for a complex society, which was developed as the time went by. Later there's a linear development of traditional complex civilizations, which represent the four conventional stages of how civilizations are usually understood to form like bands, tribes, chiefdoms (simple and complex) and civilization.
There are four factors for a complex society to be created - Agricultural development, Division of labor, Political hierarchy and Institutions.
Learn more about "complex society" at -
brainly.com/question/17332680
Answer: C.) Intangibility
Explanation: Goods and services vary in attributes. Some goods do not exhibit physicality, such goods are impossible to hold or examine physically in terms of quantity, weight, texture and other physical factors or attributes of a good. Goods or services of this nature or characteristic is called service Intangibility. In the scenario above, offering massage service is a very good example of intangible service because it cannot be physically examined or felt before purchase unlike goods such as clothes, shoes and other goods which can be physically assessed.
Students dropping out of school want peer support. If there is someone who will dropout too then there is some justification for dropping out. John is dropping out. He wants Mike to dropout too. If Mike agrees then John will feel as though he made the right decision and that dropping out must be okay because Mike is going to drop out with me.
