Money is any object in which you can exchange for goods or services. We consider this currency. Money is also a store of value so that you can get those goods and services at a later time (so you don't have to immediately use up the currency right away if you don't need to).
If at some future date, the unit of money isn't able to purchase as much as it used to, then we say that inflation has occurred. For example, if a loaf of bread costs $1 today but then $5 ten years from now, then we say inflation has kicked in.
-------------------------
Before we talk about M2, it helps to start with M0. That's a zero and not the letter 'oh'. In economics, M0 is the total collection of all cash (bills and coins) that are in circulation. This means we're just talking about physical things people can touch. Building to M1, it involves everything M0 talks about plus things like travelers checks and demand deposits. So if you're talking about M1, then you involve all physical cash as well.
Then finally moving to M2, it involves everything M0 and M1 does, plus savings accounts and time deposits. By "time deposits", I mean things like mutual funds and money market accounts. Basically things you may hear about when talking about wall street.
In short, M2 involves all physical cash plus other electronic stores of value (this is a fairly vague definition but it may work in many settings). It does not involve large time deposits as that is what M3 handles.
Answer: See Explanation
Explanation:
The payback period for both projects would be calculated as:
Alpha Project
Cost = $530,000
Annual net cash flow = $60,000
Payback period = Cash / Annual net cash flow
= $530,000 / $60,000
= 8.83
Beta Project
Cost = $170,000
Annual net cash flow = $18,000
Payback period = Cash / Annual net cash flow
= $170,000 / $18,000
= 9.4
We can see that Alpha Project is better as the payback period is lesser than Beta project
Answer:
1) Mindfulness
Explanation:
Mindfulness refers to being aware of your environment and paying attention to what happens around you, and at the same time being aware of your thoughts and bodily sensations.
In other words, it means that Dr. Riley is able to concentrate on what he is doing and at the same time is paying attention to what is around him.
Some producers are forced to sell their products at the prevailing market price because of (C) a high degree of similarity to competitor's products.
<h3>
What is the prevailing market price?</h3>
- Prevailing Market Price refers to the market's published wholesale price and, in the absence of a declared wholesale price, the prevailing market price of any commodities.
- The term "prevailing market conditions" refers to the average amount of rent paid by operators of similar sized and placed lodges throughout the country, as determined in good faith by the national protected area authority.
- Because of their great degree of similarity to competitors' products, some producers are forced to offer their items at the prevailing market price.
- The average wage paid to similarly employed workers in a certain occupation in the area of anticipated employment is described as the prevailing wage rate.
Therefore, some producers are forced to sell their products at the prevailing market price because of (C) a high degree of similarity to competitors' products.
Know more about market prices here:
brainly.com/question/24877850
#SPJ4
The complete question is given below:
Why are some producers forced to sell their products at the prevailing market price?
A. price takers find market analysis is too costly
B. they are very small players in the overall market
C. high degree of similarity to competitor's products
D. they can increase output without affecting the quality
Answer: performance feedback
Explanation: Feedback on performance is a process of communication. It should be continuous as improvements are made on the basis of information exchanged between the manager and the subordinates. Regular follow-up dialogue should be in place to determine success.
Feedback is structured to see where things go right and where they go wrong. This suggests that leaders may need to be vigilant while they develop new behaviors and conquer the learning curves of new skills.
