Answer:
$6,000,000
Explanation:
Change in risk = 0 in 1,000 to 1 in 1,000 = 0 to 0.001 = +0.001
Change in wage = $30,000 to $36,000 = +$6,000
Therefore:
wage/risk = 6,000/0.001
= $6 million or $6,000,0000
The value of a human life for workers with these characteristics should a cost-benefit analyst use is $6,000,000 because workers are willing to receive an extra $6,000 for a 1 in 1,000 increase in risk of death, implying a value of life of $6 million)Value of human life for workers with these characteristics = $6 million .
In order words the workers require $6,000 to accept a death risk of .001. The value of life implied by this is $6,000/.001 = $6,000,000.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
Fixed cost is
= $500,000 + $1,000,000
= $1,500,000
And, the marginal cost is
= $0.25 + $0.10
= $0.35 per paer
Now
as we know that
AFC = FC ÷ Q
Now for At 1,000,000 papers,
AFC is
= 1,500,000 ÷ 1,000,000
= $1.50/mo
At 800,000
, it would be
AFC = 1,500,000 ÷ 800,000
= $1.875/mo
MC = $0.35 per paper and the same is not changed
Now for break even, the average total cost is
ATC = AFC + AVC
ATC = FC ÷ Q + VC ÷ Q
VC = MC × Q
ATC = FC ÷ Q + MC
ATC = FC ÷ Q + 0.35
At Q = 1,000,000,
ATC = 1.50 + 0.35
ATC = $1.85
At Q = 800,000
, it would be
ATC = 1.875 + 0.35
= $2.225
As it can be seen that
The AFC changes from 1.50 to 1.875 which shows an increment of 0.375.
The MC remains constant or same at 0.35 as the printing and delivery costs per paper are remain same
And, The minimum amount that we must charge to break even rises i.e. from 1.85 to 2.225. That is a rise of 0.375
Answer:
A. economies of scale.
Explanation:
The economies of scale is the scale where the company has the advantage of the cost that reaped by the organization in the case when there is an efficient production. It could be accomplished when the level of production or the volume of the production rises by lowering the cost
Therefore as per the given situation, the option A is correct as it fits to the current situation
Hence, the correct option is A.
Answer:
A. elective surgery due to its lower marginal utility per dollar of expenditure.
Explanation:
As there is non essential elective surgeries, as from government's point of view since it is non essential that is not required and not utilized by major citizens of the country, and since there is requirement of budget cut-down. The government shall remove elective surgery.
as the amount of expenditure involved in these surgeries is also high and the resulting utility for each surgery is really low, it shall be removed.
