Answer: B. $65,000
Explanation:
The options to the question are:
A. $15,000
B. $65,000
C. $150,000
D. $200,000
It should be noted that the corporate liquidations of property are typically treated as either an exchange or a sale and the profit or the loss made will be recognized by the corporation usually based on the liquidating sale of the assets of the corporation.
In certain cases whereby the distributee that is, the individual who is entitled to partake in the share of an estate distribution is a corporation that is in charge of the distributing corporation, this may lead to the distribution not to be taxable.
Due to this, Alvo has a basis of $65,000. The reason is that the land was not sold and therefore Alvo did not get $200,000.
Answer:
Option c. is correct
Explanation:
Under the Golsen rule, the Tax Court must follows the Court of Appeals such that the court of appeals has direct jurisdiction over the taxpayer. The Court is said to reach a decision without calculating the tax when a Tax Court decision is said to be entered under Rule 155.
In this question, The Golsen rule applies here and weakens the legal justification for the deduction
The value of any money is determined by supplys and demands and the supplys and demands for other goods in the economy
Because the banks were down
Answer:
explanation of opportunity cost:
A. Because of scarcity, people must make choices, and each choice incurs a cost
exampes of opportunity cost:
A. The money spent on a movie ticket cannot buy a Blu-ray player
C. The time spent preparing for a test cannot be spent playing computer games
Explanation:
The opportunity cost refers to the return or ouput of the resource used in the best alternative decision.
That means, the wages we get fro ma certain job most be compared with the wages we could do in another to really check if we are making a gain or not with our job.
Same applies for capital and other factors.
