Answer:
Explanation:
The scope of private property rights in the United States has been greatly reduced during the 20th century. Much of the reduction occurred episodically, as governmental officials took control of economic affairs during national emergencies—mainly wars, depressions, and actual or threatened strikes in critical industries. Derogations from private rights that occurred during national emergencies often remained after the crises had passed. A “ratchet” took hold. People adjusted first their actions, then their thinking, to accommodate themselves to emergency governmental controls. Later, lacking the previous degree of public support, private property rights failed to regain their pre-crisis scope.
Emergency restrictions of private property rights are by no means of concern only to historians of the growth of governmental power. Today, emergency restrictions limit many private rights, and many more sweeping restrictions could be lawfully imposed at the President’s discretion. The possibility is real. Like several presidents before him, Ronald Reagan has dipped repeatedly into the government’s reservoir of emergency economic powers. The potential exists for the greatly expanded use—and abuse—of such powers.
Answer:
i dont know bro just watch ads it's the best way
Explanation:
Answer1:an international agreement, usually regarding routine administrative matters not warranting a formal treaty, made by the executive branch of the US government without ratification by the Senate Answer2: An executive agreement is an agreement between the heads of government of two or more nations that has not been ratified by the legislature as treaties are ratified. Executive agreements are considered politically binding to distinguish them from treaties which are legally binding
Answer:
B
Explanation:
This person that is called on to testify during a trial must have the knowledge or skills in the field that is relevant to the case. A psychologist may be asked to serve as a consultant to an attorney or to a testifying psychologist. This can be used to determine if someone is being truthful or if they are being deceitful. They can be appointed by the court and they can sort through claims that are conflicting or if a conclusion cannot be reached. He is there to express his opinion based on his knowledge and education.
