1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
coldgirl [10]
3 years ago
7

Which current supreme court justice has served the longest tenure?

Law
1 answer:
inysia [295]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Clarence Thomas,Their length of service ranges from William O. Douglas's 36 years and 209 days total

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why were the Articles of Confederation an unrealistic plan of government
Arte-miy333 [17]

Answer: Bc it had a weak central government which it didn't let the people rule. And each state had to have only one vote, and it couldn't collect taxes or enough money to fund its operation.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Tools
valentinak56 [21]

Answer:

Explanation:

Appeal:

An appeal is the process of making a formal request to a higher (appellate) court to reverse a lower court’s decision after the lower court has made a final judgment or ruling. Often, the losing party files an appeal with the higher court; this begins the appellate review process. An appellate court reviews the facts as presented in the trial, and no other evidence is considered in making an appellate decision. The main purpose of an appeal is to review the legal decisions made at the trial court level.

Appellant:

An appellant is the party to a lawsuit who is seeking an appeal from a lower court decision. The appellant is typically the party who lost at the trial court level. The appellant must file a notice of appeal and offer a legal brief to the appellate court, putting forth its legal arguments and its legal basis for the appeal.

Appellee:

An appellee is the party who wins the judgment at the trial court level. The appellee must respond to the appellant’s legal arguments by filing a legal brief and appear in court, if necessary, to argue to the appellate court why the lower court decision should not be disturbed.

Harmless error:

Harmless error is an error allegedly made by a lower court judge that an appellate court finds insufficient to alter or amend the lower court’s decision. The error is deemed “harmless” because reconsideration of the alleged error would have no bearing on the outcome of the lower court’s decision. An example of a harmless error would be a technical error made by the lower court that, under the applicable law, was improperly decided; yet, the remaining evidence substantially supports the original judgment.

Injunction:

An injunction is an order issued by the court which orders a party to do something or prohibits the party from doing something. An injunction may be proper when a party may be harmed by another party’s threatened actions.

Interlocutory appeal:

An interlocutory appeal is a type of appeal that seeks the review of a temporary order (such as an injunction) that is related to a pending lawsuit. An interlocutory appeal is filed and heard while the underlying action is still proceeding at the trial court level.

Mandamus:

A mandamus action is an order issued by a court that orders a governmental body or public agency to perform an act required by law. Often, a mandamus action is sought when a governmental body or public agency fails or refuses to act under an applicable law.

Writ of certiorari:

A writ of certiorari is a type of judicial order from an upper level court to a lower court (for example, the U.S. Supreme Court to a U.S. Court of Appeal) to send the court record and related documents of a particular case to the higher court for its review. A writ of certiorari is typically associated with the review of lower court decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court or state supreme courts. The appealing party must file a writ of certiorari (also sometimes referred to in short hand as “cert”) to the higher court, which may agree to review the lower court's decision ("granting certiorari") or may refuse to review the lower court's decision ("denying certiorari").

4 0
3 years ago
Hahahaha you have fallen for my trap!!!!! YOU CAN NEVER ESCAPE
Feliz [49]

Yes, I truly could not escape. Anyway thank you!

5 0
3 years ago
In a general sense, what are crimes?
Vlad [161]

Answer:

Explanation:

Crimes are basically acts that are defiant/transgression of laws that if violated the person or people who acted can be punished.

7 0
2 years ago
Why are testimonies helpful/useful?
AlekseyPX

Answer:

Survivor and witness testimonies—firsthand accounts from individuals who lived through or encountered genocide and other atrocities—help students more deeply appreciate and empathize with the human and inhuman dimensions of important moments in history.

Explanation:

go here Search Results

Lesson: Using Testimony to Teach | Facing History

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Hello, I would like to start a movement for both black lives matter and women's rights.
    11·2 answers
  • Police officers can't make an arrest for every violation of law that is, they can't
    9·2 answers
  • When a law has been violated, what must be given?
    8·1 answer
  • Anyone help me maybe i'm dumb<br> What is 7x8x9 + 10x11x12?
    7·2 answers
  • Should i ude the P90 on modern warfare?
    6·1 answer
  • Yeah. Yeah<br> Just space<br> ajdkasdksfakjhdsfjkh
    6·2 answers
  • Who's against gun control laws?
    8·1 answer
  • For a legal case, the location in which the trial may be held is appropriate in the county where the _______ resides.
    5·2 answers
  • 1.) If I Can’t Have You. Bertha shot and killed her husband and his lover after discovering them having $exxxx in his car. When
    12·2 answers
  • Why is Civic virtue considered a part of a true democracy?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!