This change indicates that her motivation changed from Intrinsic to Extrinsic.
<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>
The term Motivation refers to a driving force that causes an individual to perform a specific task or show a behavior. Motivation can enhance an individual's performance at various levels.
Broadly, there are two types of motivation:-
<u>Intrinsic:</u> In this, the source of motivation is internal or within the individual's mind. These motivations are natural such as Hunger, Curiosity, Internal fear, Internal desire, etc.
<u>Extrinsic:</u> In this, the source of motivation is external. These motivations are not natural such as Rewards, Punishments, Incentives, etc.
Jennie's motive for reading changed from an internal desire to the greed of getting a reward which means that her motivation changed from Intrinsic to Extrinsic.
If you have prepared a speech, but do not plan to use the same exact wording during actual delivery, you will be speaking extemporaneously.
<h3>What is the meaning of extemporaneously?</h3>
The act of extemporaneous means when something is done or spoken with little or no preparation.
A very good example of extemporaneous act is when an actor practices their lines only once before a performance without a preparation or advanced thought.
Read more about extemporaneous act
brainly.com/question/14221277
#SPJ1
Answer:
<h3>The comparison and contrast of Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification with Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification lies on the concept of social position and power.</h3>
Explanation:
Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective of social stratification and Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification all emphasize on the presence of a power structure in a society which directly corresponds to the position of an individual. They all believed that society operates according to the social needs and that every individual performs their tasks accordingly.
The line of distinction between Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective and Mosca’s conflict perspective lies in the nature of men. Mosca believes that man is evil and dominating by nature and that compels him/her to misuse his position. He brings out the authority and power of the ruling class as an example to this argument. He argues that people in good position will eventually become more powerful as men are ambitious and selfish. They will gradually exploit people from lower position and use their power for their own personal gains.
While on the other hand, Davis and Moore argue that the greater the role of an individual is, the greater should be the reward. They illustrate the idea that people with bigger and greater roles should be given more importance because of their greater contributions to the society. Their perspective of social stratification emphasize that not everyone can perform the exclusive task of the doctors, therefore those who could perform such complicated tasks should be paid and rewarded more. Davis and Moore do not consider misuse of position and power by people of great influence.
In my opinion, Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification is more applicable and realistic. The fact that those who worked hard deserves a reward is a universal doctrine. These people spent a lot of effort and time before acquiring the position they are in today. Their effort and hard work should be rewarded greatly as they will contribute significantly to the society. Though, this perspective does not bring into account the chances of misuse of power and position, such elements can be controlled through efficient law and state control.
Upon researching, I believe the word "catered" was
used in this context and the following choices were given. <span>
On the opposite side of the street was a restaurant of no
great pretensions. It catered to large appetites and modest purses. Its
crockery and atmosphere were thick; its soup and napery thin. ("The Cop
and the Anthem")</span>
<span>
</span>
Whenever
someone is catered to, he or she is
a.
refused
b.
shaped
c.
gratified
d.
opened
<span>Thus, the answer is c. gratified. A person who is gratified is someone who has received satisfaction as a result of receiving something. In this case, it was because of the food from the restaurant.</span>