Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
Answer:
"Nomination" is part of the process of selecting a candidate for either election to an office by a political party, or the bestowing of an honor or award. This person is called a "nominee", though nominee often is used interchangeably with "candidate"
Explanation:
Research examining the link between childhood abuse and antisocial personality disorder has found that <u>factors unrelated to child abuse might play a role in the appearance of antisocial personality disorder.</u>
Antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) is a condition in which the attitudes, habits and behaviors of a person diverge significantly from and often clash with the norms of her society. Upto 4 percent of people in the United States are estimated to have ASPD.
People with ASPD tend to display a lack of empathy and disregard for others, even to the extent of harming them. They tend to violate societal norms and laws. A high percentage of incarcerated violent offenders happen to have ASPD.
While childhood abuse is considered to be a dominant cause of ASPD, research has pointed to other causes as well, including genetics, poverty, and conflicts in the family in which they grew up.
To learn more about Antisocial personality disorder (ASPD): brainly.com/question/4031840
#SPJ4
Answer: What ask the question better.
Explanation:
The word we need to fill into the
sentence is ‘such’. ‘The following statement would be compatible with such
ideology. Therefore, capitalism should pull some psychological strings over the
population. The security sensation and the artificial welfare, based on a
massive-purchasing lifestyle, are certainly psychological mechanisms developed
by companies and most of the capitalist media.
