ANSWER: The data collected is NOT an appropriate representation that can be used to determine how much you should sell your house.
EXPLANATION: A house is evaluated by the contents which were used to build it. For instance a house built with a bricks can not be of the same value with a wood or block house, even though they have the same pattern.
Because the data does not show the values of the contents of the house, which are: walls, pattern, designs, how many stirs, roof, and interior quality, it cannot be used to determine the price you should sell your house.
Also, looking at the data gotten, you can understand that this houses has been sold according to the contents that made up the building, because some old builder were sold more costlier than some new buildings, and some building with a much bigger square feet were sold in a lower price when compared to some buildings with a smaller square feet
Answer:
A. Objective.
Explanation:
The objectives is the thing or the target that should be achieved it can be short term also there is some particular targets that could be achieved, measured and controlled
So according to the given situation, the correct option is a
Hence, the same would be considered
Answer:
9.94%(Approx).
Explanation:
Retention ratio=1- payout ratio
=1-0.32
=0.68
Sustainable growth rate=(ROE*Retention ratio)/[1-(ROE*Retention ratio)]
=(0.133*0.68)/[1-(0.133*0.68)]
=0.09044/0.90956
=9.94%(Approx).
Answer:
washing away of the top most layer of the Earth surface
Answer: $60
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that At an oral auction for a lamp, half of all bidders have a value of $50 and half have a value of $70.
The expected winning bid if there are four bidders goes thus:
Since there are four bidders, the probability that the winning bid is $50 is 1/2 and for $70, it's 1/2 as well based on the question.
The expected winning bid will now be:
= ($50 × 1/2) + ($70 × 1/2)
= ($50 × 0.5) + ($70 × 0.5)
= $25 + $35
= $60