Mr. Justice Jackson, dissenting. . . .
Much is said of the danger to liberty from the Army program for deporting and detaining these citizens of Japanese extraction. But a judicial construction of the due process clause that will sustain this order is a far more subtle blow to liberty than the promulgation of the order itself. A military order, however unconstitutional, is not apt to last longer than the military emergency. Even during that period a succeeding commander may revoke it all. But once a judicial opinion rationalizes such an order to show that it conforms to the Constitution, or rather rationalizes the Constitution to show that the Constitution sanctions such an order, the Court for all time has validated the principle of racial discrimination in criminal procedure and of transplanting American citizens. . . . A military commander may overstep the bounds of constitutionality, and it is an incident. But if we review and approve, that passing incident becomes the doctrine of the Constitution. There it has a generative power of its own, and all that it creates will be in its own image. Nothing better illustrates this danger than does the Court’s opinion in this case. . . .
yes i copy and pasted but this is your answer
That means the man was the head of the household.
The Three-Fifths Compromise was created to settle a dispute between Northern and Southern delegates.
<h3>What was Three-Fifths Compromise?</h3>
At the US Constitutional Convention, representatives from the Northern and Southern states reached a compromise by agreeing that three-fifths of the slave population.
This would be taken into account when ascertaining direct taxes and House of Representatives representation. Refer the image below for the complete question.
Therefore, The Three-Fifths Compromise to solve a dispute between Northern and Southern delegates.
To learn more about the three-Fifths Compromise, refer to:
brainly.com/question/4526851
#SPJ1
Because hitler saw them as "unpure" races.
Answer:
Explanation:
In fact, the land area of the US was roughly doubled by the purchase. This was significant because it made the US so much bigger and included so much more land that was full of resources within the country. ... The Louisiana Purchase, then, was important because it secured the economic viability of the American interior.
