Answer:
The correct option here is A) .
Explanation:
It is widely accepted that the main objective of a company is to maximize the value of company by maximizing the wealth of shareholders, which is represented through market price of company's shares ( stocks ) . Company's all around the world have made this their primary objective because if a company is not able to increase its value then its shareholders would think that the risk associated with the company has increased and it will lead them to take their investment out of company, so it is very important that a company's management ( or manager ) works in such way that shareholders wealth is maximized.
Answer:
Had it cut costs and increased its net income by this amount, The ROE would have changed 11.64%.
Explanation:
Old Net profit margin = Net income/ Revenue
= $10,600/$205,000
= 5.170731707%
Old ROE = Net profit margin*Asset turnover*Equity multiplier
= 0.0517*1.33*1.75
= 12.03487805%
New net income = $10,600 + $10,250
= $20,850
New net profit margin = $20,850/$205,000
= 10.17073171%
New ROE = 0.1017*1.33*1.75
= 23.67237805%
Change in ROE = New ROE – Old ROE
= 23.67237805% - 12.03487805%
= 11.6375%
Therefore, Had it cut costs and increased its net income by this amount, The ROE would have changed 11.64%.
Answer:
HI same here i have no friends
Explanation:
There is a site called Red Bubble. I'm going to start using it soon. It's a great site and very easy to use!
Answer:
Kevin has analyzed the situation well. However, he should also consider the fact that he saved $10 by only purchasing the shirt.
Opportunity cost is the cost of the forgone alternative. Out of the 3 choices, he only purchased 1 of the choices, the opportunity cost are the other two choices. However, he is still capable of buying the flip-flops costing $10 but he chose not to do so. He should consider it as a savings aside from it being a lost opportunity.
