Answer:
The 500-acre area is scarce because it has alternative uses: preservation in its natural state or a site for homes. A choice must be made between these uses. The opportunity cost of preserving the land in its natural state is the forgone value of the land as a housing development. The opportunity cost of using the land as a housing development is the forgone value of preserving the land.
Explanation:
Out of the above choices, C) manufacturing jobs are expected to decline because of advances in technology. Due to technology advancing in many fields, it is creating a decline for the job because technology, once developed and tested is much cheaper. A, B, and D are incorrect because you can work in the manufacturing field without a college education, the jobs within the manufacturing field vary and can pay more or less than $50,000. There is also workers all over the world who work in manufacturing, not just the immigrant labor force.
Answer: Yes, because the ETF is worth more than his original investment
Explanation:
From the information given in the question, the average inflation for next 20 years = 3.50%
Amount invested by John = $25,000
Then, the amount in 20 years after the adjustment of inflation will be:
= Amount invested (1+inflation rate)^n
= 25000(1+0.035)^20
= 25000(1.035)^20
= 25000 × 1.9898
= $49745
In this case, the answer is Yes due to the fact that the ETF is worth more than his original investment.
Answer:
Net income <u> 26,000</u>
Explanation:
Absorption costing classifies costs as production cost and non-production costs ( selling and distibution , administration e.t.c)
Income statement using Absorption costing
$
Sales Revenue 2,150,000
Less cost of goods sold
Direct material 960,000
Direct labour cost 420,000
Variable manufacturing 156,000
Fixed manufacturing <u>288,000</u>
production cost (<u> 1,824,000 )</u>
Gross profit 326,000
Selling and distribution
Variable 204,000
Fixed <u>96,000</u>
<u>(300,000) </u>
Net income <u> 26,000</u>
