Answer:
The answer to this question can be defined as follows:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
Following are the graph attachment to this question:
The second function, that is 
is not even a function.
Remember that g(x) function is the inverted f(x) function. And when you see this pattern, a reflection on the Y-axis expects you.
Reflection in the axis.
In x-axis:
Increase the function performance by -1 to represent an exponential curve around the x-axis.
In y-axis:
Increase the input of the function by -1 to represent the exponential function around the y-axis.
Answer:
If all you care about is whether you roll 2 or not, you get a Binomial distribution with an individual success probability 1/6. The probability of rolling 2 at least two times, is the same as the probability of not rolling 2 at zero or one time.
the answer is, 1 - bin(k=0, n=4, r=1/6) - bin(k=1, n=4, r=1/6). This evaluates to about 13%, just like your result (you just computed all three outcomes satisfying the proposition rather than the two that didn’t).
Step-by-step explanation:
<span>We cannot deduce about the exact location of P between J and K. But we can conclude: segment JP + segment PK = line JK.
</span><span>JP + PK = JK.
</span><span>Substitute first each.
(8z - 17) + (5z + 37) = 17z - 4
Combine like terms.
13z + 20 = 17z - 4
Isolate the variable z.
4z = 24
z = 6
The value of the variable z is then 6 units.</span>
It will be 89 because it increases by 4 each time
