Answer:
we can look at this problem from 2 different point of views:
if you have francs and wish to buy pounds: then you take 12 francs and purchase 1 ounce of gold, and then you sell it for 6 pounds. This way you will only spend 2 francs per each pound instead of 2.2.
if you have pounds and want to make a gain: you take 6 pounds and purchase 13.2 francs and you then buy 1.1 ounces of gold. Then you sell the 1.1 ounces of gold in exchange for 6.6 pounds.
Any of the scenarios does not include any transaction prices nor shipping costs, it is only theoretical.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The reason is that the values tend to vary across generations but these values are cultural and investment made largely depends on the behavioral implications of the person and his knowledge. The people around us are diverse from risk perspective. So people invest accroding to their risk appetite and behaviour.
Marketing of a boat cleaning company needs to account for targeting a segment of population that owns boats.
Explanation:
Here, in simple terms, the marketing strategy is missing the people it was supposed to target for their marketing.
The company working in the niche has to target boat owners specifically, which the marketing fails to do.
<u>Segmentation is an activity in which a wide net of marketing population is marketed to and then the clients are filtered out.</u> This is not a very effective method but it was essentially trying to <u>find which people look out for the service the company provides.</u>
Answer: Financial effects poses as economical risk while an improvement in career and better opportunity poses as potential economic benefit
Explanation:
One potential economic risk Lisa would have to face is that she would have issues with finances for the time being between when she resigned from her job, through her Master's and till she gets another job.
One potential economical benefit towards this decision is that she would have made an advancement in her career and would be at better place career wise and worth wise to compete for better jobs and improved pay from the place she left.
<h2>Gross Profit = 500,000 (Sales -COGS)</h2><h2>Net Profit = Gross Profit - Indirect exp- Dep)</h2><h2> = 500,000-55,000 -250,000</h2><h3> = 195,000</h3><h2>Tax = 66,300</h2><h2>Net Profit After TAX = NPBT- Tax</h2><h2> = 195,000- 66,300 = 128,700</h2>
Explanation:
Sale -Cost of goods Sold = Gross Profit
1,250,000-750,000 = 500,000
Net profit = Gross Profit - Indirect Exp - Depreciation)
= 500,000-55,000 -250,000
= 195,000
Tax = 195,000 x 34/100
= 66,300
NPAT = NPBT - tax
195,000-66,300 = 128,700
