Answer: A
Explanation: capital accumulation is increasing the capital structure of a society in form of profitable investments. means the gathering of objects of value; the increase in wealth; or the creation of wealth. And this can be enhance by motivating the public to sacrifice some consumer goods for some industrial good or asset.
Answer:
192.1
Explanation:
From monday and friday you earned 130$ because 6(10)+7(10)=130
Saturday you earned 96$ (12x8)
so adding those values you have 226$
you have to subtract 15% for tax.
So the equation would be
Answer:
The difference in human capital explains $7,863 of the income per worker gap while the difference in physical capital explains $20,181 of the income per worker gap.
Explanation:
Human capital refers to the skills, knowledge, and efforts of the people in producing goods and services. It is also known simply as labor. Physical capital refers to the "man-made" goods that assist in production, including machinery, equipment, and technological items such as computers.
In the given scenario, the income per worker in the United States is $82,359 - $54,315 = $28,044 more than the income per worker in South Korea. This is explained by differences in both the level of technology (i.e. physical capital) and the capability of workers (i.e. human capital).
We are informed that the income per worker in South Korea would be $74,496 if it had the same level of technology as the United States. This means that $74,496 - $54,315 = $20,181 of the income per worker gap between the two countries is explained by differences in physical capital. Hence the remaining difference of $28,044 - $20,181 = $7,863 is explained by differences in human capital between the two countries.
Answer:
No, he doesn't show diminishing marginal utility. Yes, he shows increasing marginal utility for Coke.
Explanation:
The law of diminishing returns states that the marginal or addition satisfaction or utility derived from the consumption of a product increase until a pint and then starts to decrease.
Units Total utility Marginal utility
1 10 10
2 25 15
3 50 25
After 3 bottles, John does not show diminishing marginal utility as the marginal utility (as shown above) continues to increase with each additional bottle of coke consumed.
Answer:
e. 10,500 units.
Explanation:
<em>the equivalent units of production - direct materials</em>
<em>Note : Units in ending Work in Process inventory were 50% complete with respect to direct materials</em>
units in ending Work in Process inventory (5,000×50%) = 2,500
units completed and transferred to the next stage (8,000×100% = 8,000
Total = 10,500
<em>the equivalent units of production - conversion costs</em>
<em>Note : Units in ending Work in Process inventory were 50% complete with respect to conversion costs</em>
units in ending Work in Process inventory (5,000×50%) = 2,500
units completed and transferred to the next stage (8,000×100% = 8,000
Total = 10,500
