Answer: Include a note that applauds their work
Explanation: When reviewing another student’s essay, it is important to remain respectful of their work. This reasoning is why three of the four options do not work.
While it would be wise to pay attention to the things other students do well, it can be considered plagiarism or copying to use the same technique in your own essay. This is why this option is invalid.
It is also unkind to focus only on what a student has done wrong. This negative criticism will help them realize their weak points, but will not make them aware of the strong points in the essay, something that you have realized. This is why this option is invalid.
By including a note that applauds their work, you are letting them know what they have done correct, while also boosting their confidence in their own writing skills. This is why it is the best option!
Keeping your observation to yourself so they don’t get prideful is wrong, as it does not help them understand the strong points in their essay. They will not know to use this skill in the future, making this an invalid option.
Hope this helps! Comment below for more questions.
The mood is one of hunger and desire.
The main character's hunger and desire for material goods can never be satisfied, of course -- we are told this from the the title, as she herself could be said to be "gone wrong."
The description of her overflowing shopping cart, the intensity with which she regards the magazine, and her need to buy in bulk all highlight an atmosphere of hunger and desire.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Words such as “of” and “and” are not capitalized
Answer:
I love this quote
"There are hundreds of languages around the world,
but a smile speaks them all."
Explanation:
Answer: I want to be a chef beacause cooking is a great hobby.
Explanation:
