Answer: Walking Green is an example of a CITIZEN-ACTION PUBLIC.
A citizen action public can be defined as a situation or a scenario whereby the decision of a company is being challenged by the the public which can be the consumers or any group that contribute significantly to the marketing success of the company.
The act of Walking Green challenging Kelstone Developers is an act of citizen action public.
Answer:
The concept of the world being flat has extended beyond geographical boundaries to the rapid blurring and demolition of economic ones. Globalisation is not an expansionary mindset anymore and in many cases, a strategic imperative to identify growth opportunities. Organisations are increasingly looking beyond their national markets. E-commerce and the emergence of digital and social marketing practices have led to a level playing field for organisations and customers and have redefined competition. Price wars have become increasingly common. Established brands are increasingly under threat from emerging private label brands.
Given the massive interconnectedness of the business world and emerging models of competition and growth, how can organisations maintain their core underlying brand identity? In addition to competitive market factors, worldwide external shocks like the global recession have also severely impacted businesses at both local and global level. The key question that emerges is that whether there is now a continual need for brands to adapt or face the threat of extinction if they practice consistency.
Answer:
Being parked too close to a fire engine that is also running
Explanation:
<span>When consistency is low, it is difficult for the perceiver to attribute behavior to either the person or the stimulus; instead, the best that can be said is that the behavior was caused by transient circumstances. Correct answer: D
</span>When a person's attitude is consistent<span> with their </span>behavior<span>s there is a strong relation between opinions and actions.</span>
Answer:
Option E
Explanation:
In simple words, the above case relates to the situation of lack of evidence. For proving an alleged criminal to be the culprit the law requires a full hard core proof after no further questioning regarding guilt of the culprit could be done.
In this case, eye witnesses or video camera recording could have been an aid fr Patty but as she had not presented anything to the court she can do nothing.