1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tatuchka [14]
3 years ago
13

The partnership agreement of J. Hansen and D. Hernandez reflects differences in service and capital contributions as follows: (1

) annual salary allowances of $30,000 to Hansen and $10,000 to Hernandez; (2) annual interest allowances of 10% of a partner's beginning-year capital balance, and (3) equal share of any remaining balance of income or loss. Both partners had beginning-year capital balances of $50,000. In the first year, the partnership makes $100,000. How much income would be allocated to Hansen?
Business
2 answers:
jasenka [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

$60,000

Explanation:

Hansen's annual salary allowance= 30,000

Hernandez's  annual salary allowance= 10,000

annual interest allowance of Hensen= 0.1 × 50,000= 5000

annual interest allowance of Hernandez= 0.1 × 50,000= 5000

Remaining balance=100000- 5000-5000-30000-10000= 50000

Share of each partner from remaining balance= 25000

Hensen's income= 25,000+ 5000+ 30000= 60,000

exis [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

$60,000 allocated to Hansen

Explanation:

total income generated by the partnership: $100,000

  • - salary allowance Hansen = ($30,000)
  • - salary allowance Hernandez = ($10,000)
  • - interest on capital balance Hansen = ($5,000)

<u>- interest on capital balance Hernandez = ($,5000)   </u>

net profit to be distributed = $50,000

profit distribution:

  • $25,000 to Hansen
  • $25,000 to Hernandez

Total income allocated to Hansen = salary + interests + profit distribution = $30,000 + $5,000 + $25,000 = $60,000

Total income allocated to Hernandez = salary + interests + profit distribution = $10,000 + $5,000 + $25,000 = $40,000

You might be interested in
The manufacturing cost per unit for absorption costing is:
saveliy_v [14]

Answer:

Always higher than manufacturing cost per unit for variable costing.

Explanation:

Absorption costing continuously contains fixed overheads similarly while computing the manufacturing cost.  

Conversely, under variable costing only adjustable overheads were included.

Thus, the manufacturing cost under absorption costing method is always higher than variable costing method  

Therefore, per unit cost will always be higher under absorption costing than in variable costing.

So, option C is the correct option

3 0
3 years ago
Some businesses may be able to self-finance, or fund their growth through utilization of their own net income and cash resources
adoni [48]

Answer:

B) Bootstrapping

Explanation:

Usually established businesses self finance themselves by setting a retained earnings amount that can be used for financing new or existing projects instead of being distributed to its owners (or shareholders) and without having to borrow money.

Bootstrapping refers to setting a company and making it grow without using loaned money. This means that the business either grows with money that its owners put into it, or by setting aside retained earnings.

5 0
3 years ago
Edwards Construction currently has debt outstanding with a market value of $101,000 and a cost of 10 percent. The company has EB
Mashcka [7]

Answer:

(a) (i) 0

    (ii) 1

(b) $27,775; 0.784

(c) $166,650; 0.377

Explanation:

a-1)

Interest paid = market value of debt × cost

                     = $101,000 × 0.1

                     = $10,100

EBIT = $10,100

Cash flow to shareholders = EBIT - Interest paid

                                            = $10,100 - $10,100

                                            = 0

value of equity = 0

a-2)

Debt to value = total debt ÷ total value of firm

total debt value debt is $101,000

No default is likely to occur

Hence , total value of firm = total debt

                                            = $101,000

Hence, the debt to value ratio is 1 .

(b)   At growth rate 2%

EBIT next year will be:

= $10,100 × (1.02)

= $10,302

Since there is no risk, the required return for shareholders is the same as the required return on the company’s debt.

The payments made to the shareholders increase at 2% every year.

Present value of these payments :

Value of equity = [ $10,302 ÷ (0.1 - 0.02)] - [$10,100 ÷ 0.1]

                           = $128,775 - $101,000

                           = $27,775

Debt to value ratio = $101,000 ÷ ($101,000 + $27,775)

                               = 0.784

(c)   At growth rate of 6%

EBIT next year will be:

= $10,100 × (1.06)

= $10,706

Present value of these payments :

Value of equity = [ $10,706 ÷ (0.1 - 0.06)] - [$10,100 ÷ 0.1]

                           = $267,650 - $101,000

                           = $166,650

Debt to value ratio = $101,000 ÷ ($101,000 + $166,650)

                               = 0.377

7 0
3 years ago
Seymour Clothing Co. manufactures a variety of clothing types for distribution to several major retail chains. The following cos
tia_tia [17]

Answer:

a. Variable cost

b. Fixed cost

c. Fixed cost

d. Mixed cost

e. Variable cost

f. Variable cost

g. Variable cost

h. Fixed cost

i. Variable cost

j. Mixed cost

k. Mixed cost

l. Mixed cost

m. Variable cost

n. Variable

o. Fixed cost

p. Fixed cost

q. Fixed cost

r. Variable cost

s. Variable cost

t. Fixed cost

Explanation:

Note the following categories of costs:

Variable cost: This are cost that are subject to change such cost includes purchase cost of supplies, bills based on usage, hourly wages expenses.

Fixed cost: are generally recognisable cost that are stable over time, such as rent, salary, specific expense that have a fixed price etc.

From the overall analysis of the cost of Seymour Clothing Co. it is noticed that most of their expenses are variable in nature with less of mixed and fixed expenses (cost).

3 0
4 years ago
Bonds are a popular source of financing because a.financial analysts tend to downgrade a company that has raised large amounts o
just olya [345]

Answer:D. Bond interest expenses is deductible for tax purposes while dividend paid on stocks are not.

Explanation:

This stand as an advantage for bonds where tax is only deductible after meeting the total interest expenses.

6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • A flood damaged a building and contents. The receipts from insurance companies totaled $600,000, which was $180,000 less than th
    13·1 answer
  • Alma is in the business of dairy farming. During the year, one of her barns was completely destroyed by fire. The adjusted basis
    14·1 answer
  • The section of his business plan in which Jones sets forth the purpose of his cabinet-making business-its reason for existing-is
    12·1 answer
  • Suppose the exchange rate between U.S. dollars and Swiss francs is SF 1.41 = $1.00, and the exchange rate between the U.S. dolla
    13·1 answer
  • A company reported cost of goods sold of $1,760,000 for the year.
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following laws instituted a whistle-blower bounty program in which whistle-blowers are eligible to receive 10 to 30
    14·1 answer
  • If a tax cut of $12 billion causes real GDP to increase by $36 billion, then the tax multiplier is:________.
    6·1 answer
  • Which statement best explains why reporters should use mostly primary sources?
    14·1 answer
  • Use the following information for VPI Co. to prepare a statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31 using the indirect
    9·1 answer
  • governments that are interested in minimizing the efficiency costs of taxation should only tax goods where
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!