1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vekshin1
3 years ago
15

Meaning of conflict​

Social Studies
1 answer:
kap26 [50]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

beat ...................

You might be interested in
Romans believed that early Christians were
9966 [12]

Answer:

traitors to the state

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
The First Amendment protects dissent or disagreement with or criticizing the government. Is any "dissent" NOT protected by the F
Helen [10]

Answer:

The first amendment permits all citizens of the United States of America to protest or criticize the government or government policy or action when they don't include actual threats, obscenity, incite to lawless actions, advertise or perform integral illegal conduct while they perform their protest. In all cases when this is not included. The first amendment protects the protestor.

Explanation:

All right, first of all, the first amendment says all citizens are free to manifest their thoughts about any government action but only when they don't make threats, talk obscenity, incite to lawless actions, or advertise. Also, that they can make a protest and they won't arrest them if they don't break the freedom of someone else. For example, stopping the traffic, attacking vehicles, vandalizing them is an act to be arrested because those are illegal acts. That is why many people use the term peaceful protest. Because in those protests, there is no riot or damage involved. And that type of protest is a legal protest.

8 0
3 years ago
Rumors about layoffs have been circulating all year. first, greg hears people in los angeles are going to lose their jobs, but t
Sliva [168]

Explanation:

Greg's this behavior of uncertainty is truly justified, as he has news of big lay offs in the country and especially in his city where he works. He is also uncertain about what exactly his boss thinks about his work because his boss sometimes says good about his work and sometimes says worst. He is totally devastated and has trouble sleeping at night due to overthinking about the lay off wave.

But despite his behavior is justified, he must think positive about his work and should focus more on work rather than sitting and funking at his desk. He should show more good work in these days especially to be in the good books of his boss, otherwise his this shattered behavior will make the decision of his lay off easier for his boss.

6 0
3 years ago
The recent increase in the number of accidents involving tractor-trailer rigs is due to driver
Elena-2011 [213]

1.  The main conclusion of this argument is the increase in tractor-trailer rig accidents is due to driver inexperience.

2. The number of intermediate conclusions is one. They are first, graduates do not get enough hands-on training before receiving their driving certifications.

3. The number of basic reasons is Three.  Firstly, There is a greater demand for truck drivers. Secondly,  Driver training schools have shortened their courses, and lastly, Graduates do not get enough hands-on training.

4.  The structure of the reasons for the main conclusion is linked.

  • The Intermediate conclusion is the assertion that the remainder of the argument supports or that we are led to assume is true by the rest of the argument. The information provided in the second phrase serves to support this summarization of the first sentence's key idea.
  • Linked premises also known as "connected" premises logically depend on one another and cooperate to establish a conclusion; in other words, they depend on one another. One of the dependent premises is frequently indicated by the argument's context rather than being stated directly. Enthymemes, or "hidden premises/assumptions," are what are known as these hidden premises.

Learn more about conclusions here:

brainly.com/question/11616885

#SPJ9

4 0
1 year ago
How does the gospel of wealth justify social darwinism?
WINSTONCH [101]
According to <span>The Gospel of Wealth, every person has to get paid the same amount of money, whereas the idea of social Darwinism  is that only the strongest will survive, so, I bet the way how </span><span>the gospel of wealth justifies social darwinism is that if everyone will get paid the same amount of money, the strong person won't be able to win as everyone would be alike (reminds of basic ideas of socialism).

Hope that helps!</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When making attributions about a worker’s performance, people can assign responsibility to either internal or external factors?
    10·1 answer
  • Social insurance is distinguished from public assistance, or welfare, by the fact that
    15·1 answer
  • What is the economic term for the practice of assigning small parts of a complicated job to individual workers who specialize in
    12·1 answer
  • The ability or skill to perceive assess and manage the emotions of one's self and others is called
    7·1 answer
  • Imagine that you are an elected representative in 1850. Would you support the comprromise of 1850? Why or why not
    9·1 answer
  • How does Jazz affect American<br> culture today?
    13·1 answer
  • How do these powers (initiative, referendum, recall) encourage greater citizen participation in states where they exist?
    10·2 answers
  • What effect did ¨Uncle Tom´s Cabin¨ have on the South?
    12·2 answers
  • What was the Emancipation Proclamation? Who wrote it? When?
    15·1 answer
  • Sa iyong palagay naisabuhay ba ng ilang pilipino ang prinsipyo ng pagkakaisa at prinsipyo ng pagtutulungan sa ating bansa sa pan
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!