Cancer related surgeries have absolutely no way to remove genes.
For example, BRC1 is a gene, inherited from a parent, which has been linked to breast cancer. You start out as one cell which divides again and again making copies of itself and eventually become a baby etc. Whatever genes were present at conception are in all of your cells. A surgery doesn't remove these genes, just the tumor.
As for death, in order for natural selection to take place and thus remove a deleterious gene from the population, those who have the gene have to be affected by it BEFORE they have kids.
Say for example a baby gets a mutation that causes a new disease no one has ever heard of. They die when they're 5 years old. After they die, there are no more copies of this bad gene in the population.
With breast cancer most women are in their 50's when diagnosed. This means they have already had kids and passed on their genes. To top it off all if their kids inherit a gene such as BRC1 from their mom, they they pass it on to their kids before they develop cancer and die (if they even get cancer).
I believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is the third option. President Eisenhower believed in the domino theory as applied to world politics, which is the belief that if one country becomes communist, others will follow.
Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.
Yes that’s correct it did influence the colonies
1829, having been passed by the supreme court, under the leadership of John Marshall who was a VERY big government man, in 1924.
However, the side he came down on in the Maysville Road veto was that the Maysville Road was totally local and therefore federal funds should not be used for local issues. Then again, he may have opposed the bill simply because Henry Clay supported it and those men hated each other.
So perhaps by his veto of the Maysville Road bill, he was saying he did not agree with Gibbons v Ogden but like I said, to my knowledge, there is no record on how he felt about it (but I am sure he had an opinion because the man had opinions about EVERYTHING
Answer:
The Civil Rights Movement was a peaceful protest to demand equal rights under the eye of law.
Explanation:
The Civil movement was an organized effort for social justice that occurred to end discrimination and racial segregation for black Americans. By the middle of the 20th century, black Americans had suffered from bias and brutality. Though slavery was abolished at the end of the Civil War, the integration of former slaves was not a steadfast task. Blacks were deprived of voting rights, have to face violence, and were discriminated in public offices.
The movement brought fruit in the form of the Civil Right Act of 1964, the law ensured fair jobs for all, prohibited the use of voter literacy tests and required federal officials to consolidate public amenities.
