They introduced the first anti colonization war. Like a revolution but not social
Answer:
because the British taxed the colonies without representation, the colonies were not consider fully British.
Explanation:
British was in war and to pay for the damage for the war, they decided to put high taxes on the colonies without representation, the colonies were mad because to Britain the colonists were not fully British.
Answer:
Depending on who you would choose, the answer is:
Louis Napoleon<u><em> just stuck with his writing and abandoned the people by just giving himself all the power in the new government and removing the existing parliamentary assembly. </em></u>And Otto Von Bismarck's Realpolitik result <em><u>was the Kulturkampf. </u></em>
Explanation:
It's clear that both politicians appeal to the people to achieve their goals, but Louis Napoleon and Otto Von Bismarck acted differently. <u><em>The French politician only proposed the reformation but never put in action (it was something that was only on the paper). In the end, Louis Napoleon decided to renew the Assembly. He opted for the easiest way. </em></u>On the other hand, <u><em>Bismarck was greed and violent when it comes to politics. His Realpolitik resulted in an internal war between the government and the Catholic Church, which became known as the Kulturkampf.</em></u>
The Articles of Confederation were weak because it lacked an Executive branch of government, required all states to agree on any amendments and could not collect taxes.
Truth be told, the thirteen colonies/states didn't want a strong government, they fought against the English monarchy because of this. They wanted that power remained within the states. Of course, this changed later.
