Answer:
It is false that Joint Application Development (JAD) group produces the best definition of a new system.
Explanation:
JAD group does not produce the best definition of a new system, here is why:
• JAD system incorporates participants with different opinions. Different opinions within the team make it difficult to align goals and maintain focus
• Depending on the size of the project, JAD may require a longer time that will put a strain on the execution of a project
• JAD is too expensive and can be cumbersome/difficult if group is too large
• JAD produces a details and information that is a tentative model not a complete development methodology.
Answer:
Topic Building
Explanation:
Sam is at this point trying to build his topic for the speech.
It is based on this topic a speech write up will be made.
Answer:
The answer is:
Dr Unearned Service Revenue 4,800
Cr Service Revenue 4,800
Explanation:
Since Laferty completed 60% of the landscape plan during this year, they should record $4,800 as earned revenue ($8,000 x 60%), while the remaining $3,200 should stay as unearned revenue. The journal entries should be as follows:
Dr Unearned Service Revenue 4,800
Cr Service Revenue 4,800
It diversify the workload and allows people to make more connections and all while having multiple view on one problem to help in finding or solving a problem.
Answer:
Explanation:
1) The total cost of reducing runoff if the farmers are not allowed to trade permits is:
total loss = farmer A' loss + farmer B's loss
where:
- farmer A's loss = (100 - 50) x $25 = $1,250
- farmer B's loss = (100 - 50) x $50 = $2,500
total loss = $1,250 + $2,500 = $3,750
2) The total cost of reducing runoff if the farmers are allowed to trade permits is:
Since farmer A will be willing to sell his permits to farmer B for a price that is ≥ $25 and ≤ $50, the total cost of reducing runoff is $2,500.
If farmer A sells his runoff permit at a price higher than $25 his costs will decrease but farmer B's costs will increase, so any gain due to price change is offset by the other farmer's loss.
