Is this supposed to be a multiple choice question? It is way fun to think about projects other people might be up to which carry outrageously high risk!
Restaurants are a common example -- there's a little bit of magic in whether a new restaurant will catch on and become popular.
Farming is pretty risky. You can do everything right and have a hail storm come and ruin the crops. That's why there are government programs and commodity markets that help farmers mitigate their risk -- because the rest of us who need to eat really need for people to be willing to farm!
Answer:
1. $46,550
2. $405,000
3. $450,600
Explanation:
1. Computation of differential cost regarding the decision to buy the model 200
Differential cost = Cost of a new model 300 - Cost of a new model 200
Differential cost = $396,350 - $349,800
Differential cost = $46,550
So, the differential cost regarding decision to buy model 200 is $46,550.
2. Sunk costs are the costs which are already incurred by the entity in the past and which are not relevant to decision made today. In this case, sunk cost is the cost of the machine purchased seven years ago for $405,000.
3. Opportunity cost is the profit forgone by chosen alternative course of action. In this case, the Opportunity cost regarding the decision to invest in the model 200 machine is $450,600.
Answer:
Journal.
Explanation:
Businesses record their daily financial transactions in a journal, also known as the businessperson's diary.
A journal entry involves the process of keeping the records of business transactions made by an organization.
The journal entry is used by bookkeepers and accountants. Ideally, it is important that a journal has all of following informations; date, reference number, debit balance, credit balance and transaction description.
In Accounting, most businesses use a double-entry account system and as such, the total amount debited must equal the total amount credited in a journal entry.
<span>A lack of trust between two parties engaged in international trade is exacerbated by the </span><span>problems of using an underdeveloped international legal system to enforce contractual obligations. When a strong internal legal system is put place, there is a better chance for trust to be held in trading. When doing international trade both parties need to understand their roles and responsibilities and hold up to the end of the deal. Without trust it's likely the two countries will stop trading with one </span>another.
Answer:
there is no deadweight loss.
Explanation:
In a perfect competition, there are many buyers and sellers of homogeneous products, and there is free entry and exit in the market.
This simply means that, in a perfectly competitive market, there are many buyers and sellers (price takers) of homogeneous products (standardized products with substitute) and the market is free (practically open) to all individuals or business entities that are willing to trade all their goods and services.
Generally, a perfectly competitive market is characterized by the following features;
1. Perfect information.
2. No barriers, it is typically free.
3. Equilibrium price and quantity.
4. Many buyers and sellers.
5. Homogeneous products.
Examples of a perfectly competitive market are the Agricultural sector, e-commerce and the foreign exchange market.
Hence, if equilibrium is achieved in a competitive market then, there is no deadweight loss i.e a loss of economic efficiency due to a lack of balance in competing economical influences for goods or services.
