A deductive argument is one that the arguer wants to be deductively valid, that really is, to provide a guarantee that the conclusion is correct if the premises are correct.
This principle may alternatively be put as follows: in a deductive argument, the premises are designed to give such strong evidence for the conclusion that, if the premises are true, the conclusion cannot be wrong. A valid (deductively) argument is one in which the premises successfully ensure the conclusion. If a valid argument has true premises, it is also said to be sound. All arguments are either valid or invalid, and either sound or unsound; there is no such thing as being partially valid.
Therefore, the answer is deductive argument.
To know more about deductive argument click here:
brainly.com/question/1803030
#SPJ4
Many of the great society programs can be seen as a tribute to President Kennedy. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is a
society programs?</h3>
Generally, Social programs are simply defined in the United States as programs that are aimed to meet the basic needs of the American people.
In conclusion, President Kennedy contributed to many a society programs.
Read more about society
brainly.com/question/12881643
#SPJ2
Fourth amendment right to privacy and topping a phone would be considered illegal search and seizure
Americans wanted to make George Washington president because he was a war hero, and they wanted to have someone trustworthy as president. George Washington helped win the war, and that proved that he was trustworthy.
Answer:
a. Latent dysfunction
Explanation:
Translated into the term used by functional analysts, Marx s statement that capitalism has within it the seeds of its own destruction is an example of a <u>latent dysfunction</u>. Latent dysfunctions are unintended consequences that are harmful to a system. The destruction of capitalism will be harmful and according to Marx, capitalism carries within it the seed of its destruction, its destruction is a latent dysfunction.