How does the relationship between siblings typically change from adolescence to adulthood? the siblings tend to become closer?

1 answer:

3 0

<span>During the adolescent stages in life, things seem so much bigger than they are. You can view that in the positive light or the negative to be honest. As a child, you see your siblings as another human who lives in your home with you, eats the same food, breathes the same air, loves the same parents as you. You fight over the remote control and wrestle with one another over a small toy you both insisted on needing at the same time. Within the next breath, you sit next to them and talk about your day, ask them to defend you from a so called friend who uses your kindness for weakness as your sibling reminds you of why you are so imortant in this life and deserve to be noticed for that... Swingsets, bike rides to the store, a companion who is always there to listen about how mom and dad "just aren't fair!" Fast forward to 30 years old. Life interferes with the time spent together, the playtime becomes few and far between and the bike rides are a distant memory. The things that stay though...those are very similar to my first statements on childhood with them. The love, support and time spent doesn't need to disapear. It turns into a mature type of love. You call one another every few days to check in. Make a coffee date to catch up on her latest life experience and remind them that you are always here. Those bike rides though? Now you can take them together with your own children.</span>

You might be interested in

Questions about whether anxious children will grow up to be either fearful or relaxed adults most directly highlight the issue o

kozerog [31]

Answer:

stability or change.

Explanation:

Issue regarding stability or change revolve around whether the characteristics that exist during childhood would continue to persist over their lifespan. Currently, there is very little data that support this view since our personality is more influenced by environmental factors rather than genetics.

So, anxious children would not grow up into fearful adults as long as they are exposed to healthy environment where people are encouraged to take a little bit of risk in their life.

5 0

3 years ago

Contingency adduction is the emergence of accurate responding to untrained and non-reinforced stimulus-stimulus relations follow

sukhopar [10]

Answer: False

Explanation: The statement in the question describes Stimulus Equivalence.

Contingency Adduction occurs when an individual acquires a new behaviour through conditioning and another contingency adds it to its own range of behaviors.

Stimulus equivalence on the other hand is when more than one different stimuli get the same response. Similar to the response in a situation where conditioning did not take place, although the response is accurate, it has not been reinforced.

7 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is a common myth about philosophy. Group of answer choices

finlep [7]

The correct answer is letter B.

Explanation: Philosophy is not a set of ready-made knowledge, a finished system, closed in on itself. Philosophy is a way of thinking and it is also a stance towards the world.

Therefore, philosophical questions cannot be taken as correct or incorrect, all reflections are part of the maturation of the idea, including criticism, whether positive or negative.

6 0

4 years ago

In a study to determine whether viewing pictures of poverty-stricken children increases the tendency for people to donate money

ss7ja [257]

Answer:

The dependent variable is the amount of money each group chooses to donate.

Explanation:

A simple way to be able to identify the dependent variable from the independent variable is to observe which element of the research is stimulating something to happen and what this "something" is. This is because the independent variable is the one that has the power to influence the occurrence of "something." This "something" is the dependent variable that occurs when it is influenced by the independent variable.

In the case of the above experiment, we can see that researchers want to research whether looking at pictures of poor children is able to influence the amount of money a person would donate to a charity. Thus, we can affirm that the picture of poor children is the independent variable of the experiment, while the amount of money donated by each group is the dependent variable.

3 0

3 years ago

Your friend has been sick for several days, so you go over to her home to make her some chicken soup. Searching for a spoon, you

kenny6666 [7]

Answer:c. schema.

Explanation:Schema refers to a pattern of organized Information in our mind , those set of Information is everything that we have learnt and have organized into these specific patterns which we can draw from when we need to recall certain information. Like my friend here is able to go step by step in search of a soon in a kitchen using this pattern of Information of where the spoon is located within the kitchen

8 0

3 years ago