Answer:
Have you <u>drùnk</u> all the water?
Explanation:
The sentence is in interrogative form of <u>Present Perfect</u> which consists of verb to have and verb past participle. The structure of tense can be written below as:
Have/Has + subject + past participle (V.3) + additional stuff
While the affirmative form can be written as:
Subject + has/have + past participle + additional stuff
In negative form, just add not after verb to have which becomes have not (haven’t) or has not (hasn’t)
From the sentence, our past participle of drink is drùnk. You may have to remember past participle verbs though.
**Please ignore the ù, it is u by the way but it won’t let me send so I use ù instead.**
Facts and explaining your topic with details
Answer:
No, I don't think he's very trustworthy because throughout the story you can tell how out of it and demented he is.
Explanation:
I think he just told the story as he lived it, but it might not be what had happened. From the very beginning of the story, he tries to make a case for his sanity, but the story he tells completely undermines it and is at odds with his declarations of sanity. Throughout the story, he recalls the events that led him to murder the old man and then confess. According to the text it states, "'Villains!' I shrieked, 'dissemble no more! I admit the deed!— tear up the planks!—here, here!—it is the beating of his hideous heart!'"
Answer:
"It had two wheels, and a wooden frame..." (second to last sentence)
Explanation:
I would think that because it is telling us about the features of the dandy horse and how it would look like a bike from today. But at the end of the sentence it tells us how we would need to push with our feet instead of pedaling like how we do today!
I hope this somewhat help! Good luck and have a good day! :)
