Answer:
Rural states lost population, while states with large cities gained population.
Explanation:
Rural states like Oklahoma, Indiana, and Kentucky lost a lot of population. The Dustbowl cost people their farms and lands mortgaged to pay for the seeds and fertilizers. People migrated massively to richer states like California and New York. Caravans and settlements sprouted all along the way, but mainly, the population ended in and around large cities.
They wore heavy woolen uniforms which were unsuited to Cuba's tropical heat.
It is probably more nearly correct to state that the Northern states offered more fertile soil for industrialization to grow and prosper than the South. The comments above about slavery are misstated. The Southern economy was indeed agrarian and dependent upon slave labor; however the reason for this is was that the economy in that portion of the country consisted of large scale plantations of staple crops, primarily cotton. It is manifestly incorrect to state...
I would say these three markets,
services, and
factories
The basis of the new England economy and compared to the Chesapeake
economy is their difference with the climate and geography as it has pushed an
impact to both of their economy. An example of it is their farming products,
because of the climate in the England economy, their weather is cold, making it
less fertile—making it difficult to produce compared of the Chesapeake economy.
