Answer:
x = 2
Step-by-step explanation:
i guess
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The hypothesis is written as follows
For the null hypothesis,
µd ≤ 10
For the alternative hypothesis,
µ > 10
This is a right tailed test
Since no population standard deviation is given, the distribution is a student's t.
Since n = 97
Degrees of freedom, df = n - 1 = 97 - 1 = 96
t = (x - µ)/(s/√n)
Where
x = sample mean = 8.9
µ = population mean = 10
s = samples standard deviation = 3.6
t = (8.9 - 10)/(3.6/√97) = - 3
We would determine the p value using the t test calculator. It becomes
p = 0.00172
Since alpha, 0.01 > than the p value, 0.00172, then we would reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, At a 1% level of significance, there is enough evidence that the data do not support the vendor’s claim.
Supplementary angles add up to 180 degrees-
Let x = "the angle"
supplement angle = 2x + 12 // 12 more than twice the measurement of "the angle"
Supplement angle + "the angle" = 180 degrees
(2x + 12) + x = 180 degrees // 2x + 12 is the supplement angle
3x + 12 = 180 // Simplify
3x = 168 // Subtract 12 from both sides
x = 56 degrees // Divide both sides by 3
The measure of the angle is 56° and its supplement is 124°
I do not see anything wrong with it
For No. 13 you need to calculate the distance each girl travels and compare to see whose distance is greater. The formula for distance is rate x time or d=rt. The rate is just how fast they consistently go.
Mia
d = r x t
d = 14 x 3/2
d = 21 miles
Chloe
d = r x t
d = 35 x 3/4 (btw 3/4 is just 45/60 simplified)
d = 105/4 = 26 1/4 miles
Final Answer: Chloe traveled further
For No. 14 we will recalculate Mia's distance but replace 1/5 hours with 2 hours because it says she will bike 30 minutes after Chloe had stopped. Afterwards we will compare Mia's new distance with Chloe's old distance.
Mia
d = r x t
d = 14 x 2
d = 28 miles
Final Answer: Yes Mia would be able to catch up to Chloe, and even surpass her in 30 minutes if Chloe stopped.