<u>Answer:</u>
Broker1 with $66.
Broker2 with $54.25
Broker4 with $50
Broker3 with $47.5
Broker5 with $33.5
<u>Explanation :
</u>
Total number of shares Cindy have : 300
Market Price per share : $25
Total price for the shares : 300 
$25
= $7500
Now ,
<u>Case 1:
</u>
Commission provided by broker1 = 0.75%
Online fees provided by broker1 = $ 10
Total price provided by broker1= 
=$66.25
<u>Case 2: </u>
Commission provided by broker2= 0.5%
Online fees provided by broker2=$17
Total price provided by broker2= 
=$54.5
<u>Case 3:
</u>
Commission provided by broker 3= 0.6% for 100 0r few
Not applicable because the total shares are 300
For over 100 shares
Commission provided= 0.5%
Online fees = $10
Total price = 
=$47.5
<u>Case 4:
</u>
For more than 100 shares
Online fees for buying and sharing= $50
Total price = $50
<u>Case5 :
</u>
Commision for a share bought or sold = 0.05%
Online fees =$30
Total Price= 
=$33.75
9514 1404 393
Answer:
a) yes; 12/15/17 ~ 20/25/x; SAS
b) x = 28 1/3
Step-by-step explanation:
The left-side segments are in the ratio ...
top : bottom = 12 : 8 = 3 : 2
The right side segments are in the ratio ...
top : bottom = 15 : 10 = 3 : 2
These are the same ratio, and the angle at the peak is the same in both triangles, so the triangles are similar by the SAS postulate.
Normally, a similarity statement would identify the triangles by the labels on their vertices. Here, there are no such labels, so we choose to write the statement in terms of the side lengths, shortest to longest:
12/15/17 ~ 20/25/x
__
The sides of similar triangles are proportional, so the ratio of longest to shortest sides will be the same in the two triangles. In the smaller triangle, the longest side is 17/12 times the length of the shortest side. The value of x will be 17/12 times the length of the shortest side in the larger triangle:
x = 17/12 · 20 = 340/12
x = 28 1/3
First one is 7.73 (23.19/3)
Second one is 14.04 ((19.71/7.3) x 5.2)
Answer: The graph on bottom right
Step-by-step explanation:
It’s the only one that correctly depicts the time (6 hours) and distance (300 miles) traveled. Starting at zero miles and zero drive time, it’s the only one that goes through 300 miles over a period of 6 hours.
Answer:
Runners that decrease times are not improving
Step-by-step explanation:
