The best comparison between emerging global cities and struggling global cities is that the A. "Emerging global cities are growing rapidly, while struggling global cities are stagnant or declining".
<h3>What is an emerging &
struggling centers?</h3>
These are centers that are developing quickly while those struggling cities are either declining or stagnant.
Hence, the best comparison between emerging global cities and struggling global cities is that the "Emerging global cities are growing rapidly, while struggling global cities are stagnant or declining".
Therefore, A is correct.
Read more about global cities
<em>brainly.com/question/23910388</em>
#SPJ1
Answer:
The best answer is A, "Mostly decayed matter with tiny rock particles.
Explanation:
Sand is one of the poorest soils, it has very, very low water holding capacity, as well as nutrients. I found the answer because we know it is not B, because sand does not have large rock particles, and we know that it is not c because sand has a very low water holding capacity. And we know that it is not D because it is kinda obvious that sand is not only found on the beach.
Really hope this helps! If I got it right can I have Brainliest?
The capital of Saudi Arabia is Riyadh
Answer:
A-The Amazon acts as more of a barrier to movement
b- The Amazon is much harder to get to
c- The Amazon is surrounded by farmlands
Explanation:
The Amazon river has surroundings which are largely underdeveloped with large amount of plant life. They also inhabit lots of animal life too.The surroundings are hard to get to due to poor road network.
The Mississippi River however is found in a more developed industrial area and lacks a dense plant population with good road networks.
