1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lilit [14]
3 years ago
7

Sunspots have been observed for many centuries. Records of sunspots from ancient Persian and Chinese astronomers go back thousan

ds of years. Some archaeologists think sunspot activity may somehow be related to prolonged periods of drought in the southwestern United States. Let x be a random variable representing the average number of sunspots observed in a 4-week period. In a random sample of 40 such periods from Spanish colonial times, the sample mean is x¯ = 47.0. Previous studies of sunspot activity during this period indicate that σ = 35. It is thought that for thousands of years, the mean number of sunspots per 4-week period was about µ = 41. Sunspot activity above this level may (or may not) be linked to gradual climate change. Do the data indicate that the mean sunspot activity during the Spanish colonial period was higher than 41? Use α = 0.05. (a) State the appropriate null and alternate hypothesis. (b) Compute the value of test statistic. (c) Using P-value method, state a conclusion.
Mathematics
1 answer:
Lunna [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

(a) Null Hypothesis, H_0 : \mu \leq 41  

    Alternate Hypothesis, H_A : \mu > 41

(b) The value of z test statistics is 1.08.

(c) We conclude that the mean sunspot activity during the Spanish colonial period was lesser than or equal to 41.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that in a random sample of 40 such periods from Spanish colonial times, the sample mean is x¯ = 47.0. Previous studies of sunspot activity during this period indicate that σ = 35.

It is thought that for thousands of years, the mean number of sunspots per 4-week period was about µ = 41.

Let \mu = <u><em>mean sunspot activity during the Spanish colonial period.</em></u>

(a) Null Hypothesis, H_0 : \mu \leq 41     {means that the mean sunspot activity during the Spanish colonial period was lesser than or equal to 41}

Alternate Hypothesis, H_A : \mu > 41     {means that the mean sunspot activity during the Spanish colonial period was higher than 41}

The test statistics that would be used here <u>One-sample z test statistics</u> as we know about the population standard deviation;

                            T.S. =  \frac{\bar X-\mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n} } }  ~ N(0,1)

where, \bar X = sample mean = 47

            σ = population standard deviation = 35

            n = sample of periods from Spanish colonial times = 40

So, <em><u>the test statistics</u></em>  =  \frac{47-41}{\frac{35}{\sqrt{40} } }

                                      =  1.08

(b) The value of z test statistics is 1.08.

(c) <u>Now, the P-value of the test statistics is given by;</u>

                P-value = P(Z > 1.08) = 1 - P(Z < 1.08)

                              = 1 - 0.8599 = <u>0.1401</u>

Since, the P-value of the test statistics is higher than the level of significance as 0.1401 > 0.05, so we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will not fall in the rejection region due to which <u>we fail to reject our null hypothesis</u>.

Therefore, we conclude that the mean sunspot activity during the Spanish colonial period was lesser than or equal to 41.

You might be interested in
Jolene wants to invest $2000 into a money market account. Interest is to be 6.5% compounded annually, and she wants to take the
timama [110]

Answer:

Interest = 650$

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Invest  Inv = 2000$, interest rate r = 6.5% compounded annually

and time n = 5 years

Formula for calculation is:

Int = (Inv · r · n) / 100

Int = (2000 · 6.5 · 5) / 100 = 650$

Int = 650$

God with you!!!

3 0
3 years ago
What is 15p + 7 + 5p - 49
puteri [66]
<h2>Answer:</h2><h2>20p - 42</h2><h2>Hope this helps!!</h2>

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If a drug has a concentration of 8.22 mg per 3.039 mL, how many mL are needed to give 7.469 gram of the drug? Round to 1 decimal
aalyn [17]

Answer:

2.8 litres

Step-by-step explanation:

8.22 mg per 3.039 mL

2.704 mg per 1 mL

7.469 gram = 7469 milligrams

7469 milligrams per 2,761.34927mL

= 2.761 litres = 2.8 litres

7 0
3 years ago
Allen went to the movies and bought one jumbo popcorn and two chocolate chip cookies for $5.00. Antonio went to the same movie a
SVETLANKA909090 [29]

Answer:

cookie=0.5, popcorn=4

Step-by-step explanation:

1x+2y=5

1x+4y=6

cookie cost 0.5

popcorn cost 4

8 0
3 years ago
According to a survey of​ workers,6/50 of them walk to​ work,1/50 ​bike, ​10/50 carpool, and 33/50 drive alone. What percent of
Ivenika [448]

Answer:

14%

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Formula for the area of a circle in terms of its circumference
    8·1 answer
  • What if x is 4 and y is 5?
    7·1 answer
  • The priced decreased by nine dollars
    12·1 answer
  • -6·f(-3)-5·g(-7)= please help
    12·1 answer
  • To the nearest ten thousand,the population of 620,000.
    14·1 answer
  • I don't undestand how to solve this problem
    8·1 answer
  • Given f(x) = 6x + 2, find f(x-3)
    15·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer.
    5·1 answer
  • 8. A peacock weighs 152 ounces.How many pounds does the peacock weight?
    10·1 answer
  • Ben and Carmella want to go to a basketball game. Carmella proposes they use a bag of 90 lettered tiles to decide who will pay f
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!