Answer:
the firm's demand for labour is elastic. the total wage bill decreased even though wage rates have increased. this indicates that the firm's demand for labour is sensitive to wages. As a result of the rise in wages, the demand for labour by the firm fell more than the rise in price. This indicates that demand is elastic
Explanation:
The percentage of American workers that were classified as employed in the industry that is automotive-related is only 20%. There were only 2 out 10 Americans who are working on this job. Automotive jobs cover auto dealerships, and manufacturing plants.
Double jeopardy is a legal defense which, after a clear acquittal or conviction, does not preclude an accused person from being charged on the same charge again.
Explanation:
The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution states that "no one is twice liable to be targeted at the same offense." The Double-jeopardy Clause bars any second prosecution or conviction and forbids multiple penalties of the same offense.
Double jeopardy does not shield suspects from being charged for multiple offenses, while separate charges are prohibited for the same crime.
For example, An convicted person could again be charged on the "less included crime" of involuntary killing.
Answer:
E. None of the above
Explanation:
First we need to calculate the holding period return
Holding period return is the rate of return which an assets earns during the period in which it holds the assets.
Holding Period Return = (Selling Price - Initial Price + Dividend ) / Initial Price
Holding Period Return = ($24 - $21 + $2.04 ) / $21 = 0.24 = 24%
Now we need to calculate the expected return on the stock using CAPM formula as follow
Expected return = Risk free rate + Beta ( Market Risk Premium )
Expected return = rf + beta ( E(rm) )
Placing values in the formula
Expected return = 8% + 1.2 ( 16% )
Expected return = 27.2%
Abnormal return is the difference of Holding period return and expected return
Abnormal return = 27.2% - 24% = 3.2%
To solve this problem, we first make a chart that shows the spending pattern of $90 million over 23 years.
$90 million at 11% = [math]\frac{90 \times 1.11^{23}}{100}=903.478[/math]. The future worth at the end of the 23-year is approximately $903,478.
Since the problem does not provide a standard amount of time that people usually use to measure interest rates, we can infer that this rate should be 10% per year.
Using 10% per year instead of 11%:
$90 million at 10% = [math]\frac{90 \times 1.10^{23}}{100}=897.507[/math]. The future worth at the end of the 23-year is approximately $897,507.
Since the total amount that was spent on development over a period of 23 years is $90 million and the answer in our problem has to be in millions, we have to adjust the amount.
$90 million x 100 = $9 billion. The future worth at the end of the 23-year is approximately 9 billion dollars.
