Answer:
r= 3
Explanation:
Due that the level price does not changed, the first thing that you have to do to find the equilibrium is put the two equations with an equal
Money demand =Supply of money
2,200 – 200 r= 2,000
Now you have to find the value of r and you have to clear the formula and first you have to:
2,800- 2,200 = 200r
Now that you have the number together you have to apply the operation
600 = 200r
As the 200 is multiplying the r you have to pass the 200 to divided the 600
r= (600/200)
r= 3%
The interest rate is 3%
Answer:Market segmentation is a marketing term that refers to aggregating prospective buyers into groups or segments with common needs and who respond similarly to a marketing action
Explanation:
This answer requires that we fill in the blanks. The answers are contained in the bullet to fill the missing places
- shareholder wealth
- larger the NPV
- higher stock price.
- WACC
- accept the project.
- higher positive NPV.
<h3>What is the NPV?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the net present value. This is the value that is calculated as the difference between the cash inflows and out flows for over a time period.
In order to get the NPV we have to make the following calculations for the projects A and B.
We have:
<u>For Project A</u>
-900 + 620/1.08 + 395/1.08² + 200/1.08³ + 250/1.08⁴
= $355. 237
<u> project B</u>
we would have
-900 + 620/1.08 + 395/1.08² + 200/1.08³ + 250/1.08⁴
= 378.98
The value for the project B happens to be greater than that of A hence this is the value that we have to accept
Read more on NPV here:
brainly.com/question/17185385
#SPJ1
Answer:
C. the employer defamed the former employee because the employer was recklessly indifferent to the truthfulness of the statements made
Explanation:
The simple and straightforward ruling by the court would be that the employer defamed the former employee because the employer was indifférent to the truthfulness or factual correctness of the information given to him.
The court would have clear grounds to give the former employee reprieve because the employer was not suitably interested in seeing company records and was quite content with hearing and basing a judgement based on word of mouth only.
