Answer:
both taxes would fall more heavily on the buyers than on the sellers
Explanation:
Here are the options:
a. both taxes would fall more heavily on the buyers than on the sellers. b. the macaroni tax would fall more heavily on the sellers than on the buyers, and the burden of the cigarette tax would fall more heavily on the buyers than on the sellers c. the macaroni tax would fall more heavily on the buyers than on the sellers, and the burden of the cigarette tax would fall more heavily on the sellers than on the buyers O d. both taxes would fall more heavily on the sellers than on the buyers.
Tax is a compulsory sum levied on goods and services. Taxes increases the price of goods and services
Supply is elastic if a small change in price leads to a greater change in the quantity supplied.
Demand is inelastic if there's little or no change in demand when price is increased.
More burden of tax should fall on the consumers because their demand is inelastic. So, if prices rise as a result of the tax, there would be little or no change in quantity demanded.
But in the case of suppliers, they are sensitive to price and a rise in price would cause quantity supplied to fall and revenue would fall.
I hope my answer helps you
The country of origin effect occurs when the location of a product changed into manufactured affecting how clients understand the product.
The country of origin is the country of manufacture, production, or growth where an article or product comes from. The united states' beginning is u. s. a . you come back from. In fashionable, it's far from the united states of nationality. For a few expatriates who accumulate another nationality, their united states of beginning might be that of their “1st” nationality. country of beginning impact (COE) can be described as any impact that the country of manufacture, meeting or design has on a purchaser's tremendous or bad perception of a product.
In the country of origin, the beginning is of manufacture, manufacturing, or growth from which a piece of writing or product comes from. us of an origin is not to be stressed with wherein the product became shipped from as this will no longer be similar to wherein it become in the beginning produced. u. s. a . of the foundation is vital for clients with ethnocentric notion structures and lots of customers select merchandise from advanced international locations. The united states starting place is used as an external sign for purchasers in evaluating the first-class of the product.
Normally talking, the Country of origin is the USA of manufacture, production, or increase in which a piece of writing or product comes from. u. s. a . of starting place isn't to be stressed within which the product changed into shipped from as this can no longer be the same as wherein it turned into at the start produced. The authority's e-market (GeM) portal, that's utilized by government departments for public procurement, has additionally made it obligatory for dealers to publish the USA of starting place whilst registering new products.
Learn more about your country of origin here
brainly.com/question/1899198
#SPJ4
Answer: By creating risk pools, insurance companies help spread the risk and avoid the type of massive payout required after a catastrophic loss. It is a form of risk management for insurance companies. If a claim is made for reimbursement due to that catastrophic loss, the participating insurance companies spread the loss among themselves.
Explanation:
Organisations should not be scared in this because it was found that investing in enterprise project management for IT projects is extremely important. Not only can it save the company time, money, and resources, enterprise project management can help manage multiple projects concurrently. This can keep the company organized and efficient as they carry out projects simultaneously.
Answer: The correct answer is "C) giving up rather than standing up to the boss as required by law.".
Explanation: This is a situation of: <u>giving up rather than standing up to the boss as required by law.</u>
Michael should have sued his boss before the law so that he could instead be compensated for the bad treatment and discrimination and also collect unemployment compensation in the event that the employment relationship is terminated.
