Answer:
produces
increases
trade-offs
Explanation:
The law of increasing opportunity cost states that when firms decide to make additional units of a certain product by reallocating resources, they do that at a higher opportunity cost than the previous production. The major traceable reason for this is inefficiency in resource reallocation.
This increase in opportunity cost is associated with increasing and increasing trade-off.
Answer:
No, because they weren’t willing to risk their life to complete a task at the appliance plant. By law this is not safe working conditions and the people forcing employees to do this could be sued.
Explanation:
This statement is false.
Conversion and direct materials are generally both not added at the end of the production process. As a matter of fact, they are either added at the beginning, or in the middle of the process, but definitely not at the end because then it would be too late.
Answer:
Russia and China used to be command economy with the property rights lying solely with the government and the means of production, except labour were owned entirelyby the government. However, the command economy demanded long term planning that needed to be ultra accurate.moreover the system it self gave rise ro bureaucracy and dictatorial regimes, increasing the power centralization and the state corruption and lessening the innovative spirit of the nation.
Capitalism got rid of most of the problems in the command economy. It was accompanied by the democratic reforms in Russia and this led to more transparency. Moreover, the capitalist style social market economy in China introduced private ownership and Entrepreneurship l along with the concept of state owned companies.
In addition, the function of the price mechanism was pivotal as well. Instead of thorough and detailed planning, the resources were distributed by the price and the market demand and supply.
Explanation:
Answer:
c.$176,720
Explanation:
Calculation for The NPV for this project
NPV=-450,000+200,000 / (1.16)^1+225,000 / (1.16)^2+275,000 / (1.16)^3+200,000 / (1.16)^4
NPV=-450,000+172,414+167,212+176,181+110,458
NPV=176,720
Therefore The NPV for this project is closest to :176,720