1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
laila [671]
3 years ago
13

If $30 can buy a dozen roses in the United States, and purchasing power parity holds, then $30 should also be enough to buy a do

zen roses in Turkey—or, more specifically, the Turkish lira equivalent of $30 should be sufficient to buy a dozen roses in Turkey. Suppose purchasing power parity does not hold between the two nations, which of the following would account for a discrepancy in the price of a dozen roses?
a. identical roses
b. non-identical roses
c. transportation costs
d. roses are not perfectly tradable
e. prices may not have fully adjusted
Business
1 answer:
pochemuha3 years ago
7 0

Answer: b. non-identical roses

c. transportation costs

d. roses are not perfectly tradable

e. prices may not have fully adjusted

Explanation:

The roses in the two countries might not be identical and so will probably not be charged the same. They may be Differentiated so different prices will be charged.

There is also transportation costs to account for. If the roses are being grown in the US for instance the transfered to Turkey, the transport cost will be included in that figure as opposed to the US where it was produced.

If the Roses are not perfectly tradable, that could lead to a difference in price as well because the amounts will differ as the roses cannot go for the exact price in both countries.

Finally, prices in Turkey may not have fully adjusted to prices in the US yet. When that happens then they might be charged at the same amount.

You might be interested in
As an importer of grain into Japan from the United States, you have agreed to pay $377,287 in 90 days after you receive your gra
riadik2000 [5.3K]

Answer:

B)  ¥6092.53

Explanation:

We can hedge the risk by buying dollars forward contract at a price of ¥106.02/$ which is 90 days forward rate because the payment is due in 90 days. The total contract would amount to ¥106.02/$ * $377,287 = ¥39,999,967.74

The second alternative is to buy dollar at todays date. The present value of the dollars will be ;

$377,287 / 1.008125 = $374,246.25  

If we buy dollars at spot rate then,

¥106.35/$ × $374,246.25 = ¥39,801,088.69

The future value of yen will be :

¥39,801,088.69 × (1.00484375) = ¥39,993,875.2

The difference between the two alternatives will be :

¥39,999,967.74 -  ¥39,993,875.2 =  ¥6092.53

7 0
3 years ago
Dennis took 12 index card and wrote the number 1 -12 on them what number collected the cards,shuffled them , and drew one card f
nadezda [96]

1, or 100%.

There are 12 different cards, and all 12 of them have a number greater than 0, so the probability is 12/12, which can be simplified to 1.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following acronyms identifies the Big Five personality dimensions
Burka [1]
The answer will be CANOE. Hope this helps:)
3 0
3 years ago
"during its first year of business, xyz inc. purchased $1,600 of supplies. by the end of the year, only $500 of supplies remain
algol [13]

The correct answer is $500.

An adjusted trail balance is prepared at the end of the accounting period. On this statement you will have what the value of the supplies in inventory is on the last day of the accounting cycle. In this example there are $500 worth of supplies left, which is why it is the correct answer.

6 0
3 years ago
Compute the two-year nominal interest rate using the exact formula and the approximation formula for each set of assumptions lis
gregori [183]

Answer:

a) 2.5%

b) 6%

c) 3.5%

Explanation:

The Formula to be used is the <em>habitat hypothesis </em>

as stated in the document attached below

a)  it = 2%; it+1 =3%

i_{2,t} = 0 + ( 2 + 3 ) / 2

    = 2.5% ( two year nominal interest rate )

b) it = 2%;  it+1+1 = 10%

i_{2,t} = 0 + ( 2 + 10 ) / 2

     = 6% ( two year nominal interest rate )

c) it = 2%;  1t+1 = 3%. ∝₂,t = 1%

i_{2,t}  = 1 + ( 2 + 3 ) / 2

     = 1 + 2.5 = 3.5%

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • At the scene of the crime, the evidence collector found a damp, bloody shirt. the evidence collector quickly wrapped the shirt i
    9·1 answer
  • What is a major corporation that includes a number of smaller companies in unrelated industries?
    9·1 answer
  • The __________ insures deposits held in credit unions.
    6·2 answers
  • at a trade meeting, country A and country B, which are trade partners, agree to remove trade barriers to stimulate economic grow
    11·2 answers
  • Sales for a _________ product begin immediately after introduction because the benefits of purchase are readily understood by co
    9·1 answer
  • When the US government becomes aware of economic changes, the discovery is most likely to influence how the nation allocates res
    15·2 answers
  • The following occurred during 20X1. A $35,000 note payable was issued. Land was purchased for $50,000. Bonds payable (maturing i
    15·1 answer
  • Looking at the relationship between elasticity and total revenue, we can say that
    7·1 answer
  • Which form of market segmentation is Coca Cola using when they look at the values, attitudes, and lifestyle of their target mark
    14·2 answers
  • On November 1, 2015, Ybarra Construction Company issued $400,000 of 5-year bonds that pay interest at an annual rate of 5%. The
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!