In this statement, Maslow is arguing that not all of our needs are equally important. Some needs, such as food or thirst, are our priority, and only when we satisfy these do we begin to think about others such as love and self-esteem.
An example that shows this are people who live in extreme poverty and steal food. People in this situation would rather compromise their safety, freedom and maybe even self-worth in order to satisfy their hunger.
However, some evidence points to the opposite as well. For example, soldiers who join the war do so to fulfill abstract needs such as earning respect and finding meaning, even if this means risking their safety, having little to eat and facing many uncomfortable situations. Another example is athletes. Athletes train to a degree that is uncomfortable and hard. They also limit their food intake to certain types of food in order to achieve goals such as self-fulfillment and a higher self-esteem.
Option C
The peer review process, in which scientists submit write-ups of their ideas and experiments to a set of colleagues who judge how good the ideas are before the ideas can be published, is: A useful and important, even if imperfect, mechanism of quality-control for the scientific literature
<u>Explanation:</u>
The peer-review practice endures to approve scholarly work, accommodates to enhance the worth of proclaimed research, and builds networking circumstances in research areas. Notwithstanding critiques, peer review is yet the unique internationally affirmed system for research validation.
Peer review guarantees that documents undergo a fair evaluation and skillful opinion, enabling scholars to develop their script and therefore high-quality experimental interpretation and articles to be proclaimed. It also encourages the browsers to believe the scientific uprightness of the report and to present notified declarations where peer reviewer comments are ready.