Answer:
The answer is option c.
Explanation:
This fact would be better explained by a pavlovian perspective since it was Ivan Pavlov who invented the classical conditioning theory. In this theory he would try an unconditioned stimulus (a bell) with a dog, expecting it to salivate as a response. The sound would be associated with food.
The process that would not normally be disrupted by acute labyrinthitis. a) Ossicle movement.
Labyrinthitis is the irritation of part of the inner ear referred to as the labyrinth. The eighth cranial nerve (vestibulocochlear nerve) may also be infected. The inflammation of those reasons is a feeling of spinning (vertigo), listening to loss, and other symptoms.
It takes time for labyrinthitis signs and symptoms to move away absolutely. Severe signs and symptoms commonly depart within a week. most of the people are absolutely higher within 2 to 3 months. Older adults are more likely to have dizziness that lasts longer.
The signs of labyrinthitis and vestibular neuritis can also come on unexpectedly. Signs and symptoms of the 2 conditions may be very similar. you may: have vertigo – this is the sensation that you, or things around you, are spinning even when you're still. It takes time for labyrinthitis symptoms to move away completely. Excessive symptoms typically go away inside every week. most people are absolutely higher within 2 to a few months. Older adults are much more likely to have dizziness that lasts longer.
The question is incomplete. Please read below to find the missing content.
What process would NOT normally be disrupted by acute labyrinthitis?
a) Ossicle movement
b) Head movement detection
c) Balance
d) Hearing
Learn more about labyrinthitis here brainly.com/question/802655
#SPJ1
Answer:
Explanation:
Charlotte's guilt is the right response to the unbiased wrong of stealing.
Charlotte has been influenced by the society to develop poor unsatisfactory feelings towards certain characters and cared more for justice.
Charlotte did not accept the fact that she warrants her state of poverty and the other man deserves his wealth
Term used for a situation in which paired-choice voting by majority rule fails to produce a consistent ranking of society's preferences for public goods is the paradox of voting.
The paradox of voting, also known as Downs' paradox, states that the costs of voting usually outweigh the expected benefits for a rational, self-interested voter. Because the likelihood of exercising the pivotal vote is negligible in comparison to any reasonable estimate of the private individual benefits of the various possible outcomes, the expected benefits of voting outweigh the costs.
Responses to the paradox of voting have included the belief that voters vote to express their preference for a candidate rather than to influence the outcome of the election, that voters exercise some altruism, or that the paradox ignores the collateral benefits associated with voting that are not related to the resulting electoral outcome.
Learn more about paradox of voting here:
brainly.com/question/17136492
#SPJ4
