Answer:
1
Step-by-step explanation:
Keep-Change-Flip
4/12 (keep) × (change) 12/4 (flip)
4/12 × 12/4
4 × 12 = 48
12 × 4 = 48
48/48 = 1
(23 centimeters) x (10 millimeters/1 centimeter) = <em>230 millimeters</em>
Answer:
Mean is 3, median is 1, and range is 6
Step-by-step explanation:
Im a smart dude with a great attitude
Answer:
<h3>
f(10) = 37</h3>
Step-by-step explanation:
f(n) = 4n - 3
f(10) = 4×10 - 3 = 40 - 3 = 37
<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
No, this is not a plausible value for the population mean, because 5 is not within the 95% confidence interval.
====================================================
Explanation:
The greek letter mu is the population mean. It has the symbol
which looks like the letter 'u' but with a tail at the front or left side.
The question is asking if mu = 5 is plausible if the researcher found the 95% confidence interval to be 5.2 < mu < 7.8
We see that 5 is <u>not</u> in that interval. It's a bit to the left of 5.2
Since mu = 5 is not in the interval, it's not a plausible value for the population mean.
Have we ruled it out with 100% confidence? No. Such a thing is not possible. There's always room for (slight) error. The researcher would need to do a census to be fully confident; however, such practices are very time consuming and expensive. This is the main reason why statistics is important to try to estimate the population with a sample.