The given statement “Common law do governs all contracts except being modification or replacement from the statutory law or administrative agency regulations” is true.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The clauses and exception to the laws of contracts under the governance of contracts comes under the Contract’s privity. The privity is said to be the doctrine for the creation of the common law.
These doctrine defines the exception of common law applicable to all type of contracts with the exception of the order being implied by statutory laws by either modification or replacement. Similar for the modification or replacement done through regulations of administrative agencies.
I believe B as they have a right to testy if they want to but the lawyer just shut him down in fear of losing the case so it could be either unethical or illegal
Answer:
"Evidence that is formally presented before the trier of fact (i.e., the judge or jury) to consider in deciding the case. The trial court judge determines whether or not the evidence may be proffered. To be admissible in court, the evidence must be relevant (i.e., material and having probative value) and not outweighed by countervailing considerations (e.g., the evidence is unfairly prejudicial, confusing, a waste of time, privileged, or based on hearsay). Also termed competent evidence; proper evidence; legal evidence."
Explanation:
Answer:
b. have a remedy of damages or rescission if this information was withheld from them
Explanation:
In business law, one of the main grounds of rescission are: misrepresentation (whether fraudulent, negligent or innocent), non-disclosure in relation to contracts of insurance, and
undue influence, duress and unconscionability.
In this case, RaeAnn and Rick have a remedy of damages or rescission if this information was withheld from them
