Answer:
Democracy itself is defined through the concept of institution. A democracy, Przeworski told us, is possible when the relevant political forces can find institutions that give a reasonable guarantee that their interests will not be affected in an extremely adverse way in democratic competition, that is, when interests are subjected to institutionalized uncertainty. (1986). Trust in institutions is closely linked to political culture. Almond and Verba in The Civic Culture: political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations (1963) in a study carried out in 1959, they detect that in what they call a modern society there is much more participation, the key for them would be in the political culture. This refers to the attitude of individuals towards the political system and the role they play as individuals within it. Both attitudes, according to Almond and Verba, can be appreciated through certain patterns of orientation towards the political objects of a nation. These patterns can be of four forms: political orientation, which refers to the internalization of the objects of the political system and the relationships between these objects: the cognitive orientation of the system, which refers to the knowledge of what there is, for example the results of public policy; affective orientation, which focuses on feelings towards the political system, its roles, and functioning; and finally, evaluative orientation, which unites the elements of the previous orientations and allows generating evaluative criteria. Trust in institutions permeates these three levels of political orientation. Finally, Frederick C. Turner and John D. Martz (1997) have analyzed the case of Latin America, where the trust of citizens in institutions is an essential factor for the consolidation of democracy. Ludolfo Paramio (1999) argues that party identification and trust in institutions are conditions for the proper functioning of democracy. In short, institutions are the basis, feed and give value to democracy through various mechanisms at different times. March and Olsen (2006) point out that there are various theoretical approaches to institutions that are distinguished mainly by: first, how they conceive the nature of institutions; second, how they explain the processes that translate into structures and rules and their political impacts, and, lastly, the processes that turn human behavior into rules and structures to maintain, transform or eliminate institutions
I believe the answer is: <span>binge-eating disorder
One characteristic of binge-eaters is that they often unable to control themselves to eat large quantity of food and would automatically feel guilty afterward. This condition is considered to be mild compared to other psychological disorder and could be fixed with simple conditioning.</span>
Answer:
the answer is true the Frank's did create Feudalism
Answer:
The people grant power to a government for the well-being of all
Explanation:
This theory is one of the speculations that originated. It has been raised since the time of the critics of Greece, yet it has got acknowledgment in the hands of the incredible trio. The name of these extraordinary savants was – John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, and Jean Jacques Rousseau.
It expresses that the conditions in the condition of nature sooner or it became terrible, and to happen to this circumstance, the individuals entered themselves into an agreement, and as indicated by this agreement, the individuals will give up some piece of their entitlement to the sovereign.
The three groups of people may be blamed for the vehicular air pollution in respect to the following reasons:
(1) manufacturers may be blamed for not exerting effort in devising or developing vehicles that would cause lesser pollution,
(2) consumers may be blamed by choosing convenience over the environment, when one is a walking distance from the destination, one should walk or take the public transportation instead, and
(3) government may be blamed for not devising laws that would address the given problem.
