1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dedylja [7]
3 years ago
10

Personal traits can account for violent behavior. Psychologist Dorothy Ottnow Lewis found that murderous youths often suffer sig

ns of:
Law
1 answer:
marysya [2.9K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Psychologist Dorothy Otnow Lewis found that murderous youths suffer signs of neurological damage and the neuroticism aggravated personality trait.

Explanation:

All right, Dorothy Otnow was a psychiatrist that studied violent behaviors and disorders related to them. She found out that very often, people who committed these atrocities had two singular characteristics. They had poor emotional control, and brain damage at a certain level. Now, she concluded that thy were connected and that one was the cause of the other. Meaning that organic failure triggered the poor emotion's control. Because the brain structure was not capable of development to achieve emotion control. Therefore, the subjects had strong neuroticism personality traits.

You might be interested in
Which historic court case determined that the necessary and proper clause gave congress the implied power to enact legislation n
skelet666 [1.2K]

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) is a historic court case that determined that the necessary and proper clause gave congress the implied power to enact legislation necessary to carry out the powers granted to them.

In the case of McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), the Supreme Court came to the conclusion that the state of Maryland did not have the authority to levy taxes against the Second Bank of the United States. This was due to the fact that Congress had implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8 to construct the Bank.

With what is perhaps Chief Justice John Marshall's strongest decision, McCulloch rejected the extreme states' rights arguments made by counsel for Maryland in resounding language while simultaneously giving Congress vast discretionary ability to effectuate the enumerated powers.

This result gave rise to the idea of Congress' implied authority in the Constitution, which holds that Congress has powers beyond those expressly enumerated in the United States Constitution, including powers that may assist such authorities in carrying out those expressly enumerated in the Constitution.

Learn more about McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)- brainly.com/question/20593754

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can someone give ma an argument from the Tinker v. Des moines court case.
Alinara [238K]

Answer:

In a 7-2 choice, the Supreme Court's larger part ruled that not one or the other understudies nor instructors “shed their sacred rights to opportunity of discourse or expression at the school building gate.” The Court took the position that school authorities seem not deny as it were on the doubt that the discourse might disturb the learning

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
(BRAINLIEST PLS HELP ME )
kvv77 [185]

Answer: Poison, sperm, lead, microbes from bodies of water, and drugs. Thats all i can think of but im sure there is alot more

8 0
3 years ago
In your own words, describe what Democracy is, and evaluate democracy in your own words. (8 Mark Question)Required to answer. Mu
MatroZZZ [7]

Explanation:

The notion of democracy has evolved over time considerably, and, generally, the two current types of democracy are direct and representative. In a direct democracy, the people directly deliberate and decide on legislation. In a representative democracy, the people elect representatives to deliberate and decide on legislation, such as in parliamentary or presidential democracy. Liquid democracy combines elements of these two basic types.

Prevalent day-to-day decision making of democracies is the majority rule, though other decision making approaches like supermajority and consensus have been equally integral to democracies. They serve the crucial purpose of inclusiveness and broader legitimacy on sensitive issues, counterbalancing majoritarianism, and therefore mostly take precedence on a constitutional level.

In the common variant of liberal democracy, the powers of the majority are exercised within the framework of a representative democracy, but the constitution limits the majority and protects the minority, usually through the enjoyment by all of certain individual rights, e.g. freedom of speech, or freedom of association. Besides these general types of democracy, there have been a wealth of further types.

Democracy makes all forces struggle repeatedly to realize their interests and devolves power from groups of people to sets of rules. Western democracy, as distinct from that which existed in antiquity, is generally considered to have originated in city-states such as Classical Athens and the Roman Republic, where various schemes and degrees of enfranchisement of the free male population were observed before the form disappeared in the West at the beginning of late antiquity. The English word dates back to the 16th century, from the older Middle French and Middle Latin equivalents.

According to American political scientist Larry Diamond, democracy consists of four key elements: a political system for choosing and replacing the government through free and fair elections; the active participation of the people, as citizens, in politics and civic life; protection of the human rights of all citizens; and a rule of law, in which the laws and procedures apply equally to all citizens. Todd Landman, nevertheless, draws our attention to the fact that democracy and human rights are two different concepts and that "there must be greater specificity in the conceptualisation and operationalisation of democracy and human rights"

6 0
3 years ago
Are you in favor or against the Reproductive Health Law, Explain Why or Why not?<br> 50 words
Dvinal [7]

Answer:

Since 40 years have passed since the Supreme Court granted women the legal right to an abortion in its landmark case Roe v. Wade, the issue is still roiled in controversy, as antiabortion groups and state legislatures attempt to chip away at a woman’s right to choose. Over the past two years, 135 new state-level abortion restrictions were enacted. Additionally, 20 states are allowing insurers or employers to deny women affordable contraception by refusing to comply with Obamacare’s birth-control mandate.

In spite of those hurdles, pro-choice advocates have not given up in their fight for reproductive justice. The passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, for example, was certainly a victory for those who want to make family-planning tools accessible to all women because it increased health insurance coverage for women while lowering their health costs. Thanks to the health care reform law, millions of more women of color have access to contraception starting in August 2012.

Yet, as the following facts show, there’s still work to be done to ensure that all women especially women of color can access their legal right to decide when and whether to be a parent. Below are the top 10 reasons why women of color have a particularly significant stake in the conversation on abortion and reproductive rights.

Hope this helps, have a nice day! :D

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Do you know any good websites to practice law? Please write them down with a link.
    9·1 answer
  • El sector terciario tiene que ver con los servicios publicos, por lo tanto aqui en nuestro municipio el encargado de este servic
    10·1 answer
  • Please help will mark brainliest!
    11·1 answer
  • If someone owns a piece of land, do they own it all the way to the center of the earth?
    10·2 answers
  • Please I’m on a time limit
    11·2 answers
  • Common law is based on civil law <br>A. True <br>B. False​
    13·2 answers
  • ?????? anyone know this?​
    15·1 answer
  • Bài toán IQ tính chiều cao cái bàn? , biết: Nếu con mèo ở trên cái bàn, còn rùa ở dưới cái bàn thì khoảng cách 2 con vật là 170
    10·1 answer
  • A warrant is required when arresting a juvenile for a criminal act? True or False
    14·1 answer
  • Which statement is an accurate description of the American federal system?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!