1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zheka24 [161]
2 years ago
6

Do you agree or disagree with Hamilton and Madison’s initial logic that the bill.of rights was essentially unnecessary ?

History
1 answer:
Sever21 [200]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

No, I do not agree with their view.

Hamilton and Madison believed that a bill of rights would limit the rights that would be protected by the constitution, because some rights would be specified while others wouldn't.

I do not agree, and I believe that it is important that the constitution has a bill of rights precisely because it states clearly what rights should be protected, and in which manner.

If new rights are found or accepted by society as a whole in the future, new amendments to the bill of rights can be added.

You might be interested in
PLESSS I BEG OF U HELPP ME
ziro4ka [17]

Answer:

A. Make it sound thrilling and exciting

Explanation:

By doing this they make it sound harmless and fun so more people would join the military....

6 0
3 years ago
Good morning! anyone wanna talk on padlet?
Katena32 [7]

Answer: What is that?

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The first African American player in Major League Baseball was Ford Frick. Branch Rickey. Thurgood Marshall. Jackie Robinson.
IRINA_888 [86]
It would be Jackie Robinson
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Between 2003 and 2011, approximately ______ journalists died covering the war in Iraq.
lara31 [8.8K]
150 journalists died during the war in iraq
4 0
3 years ago
There were three major plans for Reconstruction, submitted by Lincoln, Johnson, and Radical Republicans. Although different, the
11111nata11111 [884]

<em><u>Answer:</u></em>

  • Congress should have the authority to decide all issues.

<em><u>Explanation:</u></em>

Both Lincoln and Johnson's arrangement needed a brisk re-affirmation for the South.  

Johnson's arrangement wasn't as eager to give as much opportunity to recently free slaves as Lincolns seemed to be.  

In contrast to Johnson's arrangement, the arrangement they had needed to rebuff the south.  

The Radical Republicans needed to rebuff the south to leave. They needed to remove the ex-confederates/supporters appropriate to cast a ballot. They considered it the Iron Clad Oath. They offered the most security to the liberated slaves, of each of the three plans, however they moan to generally profit white Northerners. They likewise looked to make a Black Code.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did the hebrew scholar ezra help write , which is now consideredthe holy book of judaism.
    11·1 answer
  • What was true about African Americans in the military
    13·2 answers
  • Under the articles of confederation how many votes did it take to pass the law
    15·1 answer
  • When the war officially started in 1938, did America join right away?
    5·1 answer
  • 1. A key component of a "nation" is a
    15·2 answers
  • O que é o classicismo?
    13·1 answer
  • What are the major uses of amazon land that has been deforested and burned
    13·1 answer
  • European settlers often associated American Indians with _____ stereotypes. One such stereotype was that American Indians were
    12·1 answer
  • True or False - A social revolution accompanied the 1911 Republican Revolution.
    6·1 answer
  • GET MARKED BRAINLIEST
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!