Do you agree or disagree with Hamilton and Madison’s initial logic that the bill.of rights was essentially unnecessary ?

History

1 answer:

Sever21 [200]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

No, I do not agree with their view.

Hamilton and Madison believed that a bill of rights would limit the rights that would be protected by the constitution, because some rights would be specified while others wouldn't.

I do not agree, and I believe that it is important that the constitution has a bill of rights precisely because it states clearly what rights should be protected, and in which manner.

If new rights are found or accepted by society as a whole in the future, new amendments to the bill of rights can be added.

You might be interested in

These are goods provided by the federal, state and local governments for the public as group

erastova [34]

Answer:Public Goods

Explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

What role did religious structures, such as temples and ziggurats play in a mesopotamian city?

34kurt

In ancient Mesopotamian civilization, Ziggurats were built for local religions. These were raised platforms in temple complexes that accommodated many rooms and chambers for temple priests to take care of the God and Goddess. They were built with a notion that the temples will be closer to heaven and also Gods.

The kings would continuously rebuild the ziggurats above the old one to prove their religious dedication and fervor.

3 0

2 years ago

Identify the statements that CORRECTLY describe a power of Georgia's executive departments.

lana [24]

Answer:

1st two are correct

but not too sure about the 4th

5 0

2 years ago

Which term describes a society that has been radically changed by technology

raketka [301]