The <em>correct answer</em> is:
The diagonals of the parallelogram are congruent.
Explanation:
In every parallelogram, opposite angles are congruent. This would not mean it is a rectangle.
Consecutive sides of a parallelogram are only congruent if the parallelogram is a rhombus or a square; this would not be a rectangle.
The diagonals of every parallelogram bisect each other. This would not mean it is a rectangle.
The diagonals of a rectangle bisect each other. If we know this is true about our parallelogram, this means our parallelogram is a rectangle.
Answer:
b
Step-by-step explanation:
make a formula, its the easiest way to solve problems like these also its very efficent
Answer: 1/4 fraction .25 decimal
Hope this helps :)
X + y = 3500 -------------- (1)
x - y = 2342 --------------- (2)
(1) + (2):
2x = 5842
x = 2921 -------------- Sub into (1)
x+ y = 3500
2921 + y = 3500
y = 3500 - 2921
y = 579
----------------------------------------------
Answer: x = 2921, y = 579
----------------------------------------------
The first solution is quadratic, so its derivative y' on the left side is linear. But the right side would be a polynomial of degree greater than 1, so this is not the correct choice.
The third solution has a similar issue. The derivative of √(x² + 1) will be another expression involving √(x² + 1) on the left side, yet on the right we have y² = x² + 1, so that the entire right side is a polynomial. But polynomials are free of rational powers, so this solution can't work.
This leaves us with the second choice. Recall that
1 + tan²(x) = sec²(x)
and the derivative of tangent,
(tan(x))' = sec²(x)
Also notice that the ODE contains 1 + y². Now, if y = tan(x³/3 + 2), then
y' = sec²(x³/3 + 2) • x²
and substituting y and y' into the ODE gives
sec²(x³/3 + 2) • x² = x² (1 + tan²(x³/3 + 2))
x² sec²(x³/3 + 2) = x² sec²(x³/3 + 2)
which is an identity.
So the solution is y = tan(x³/3 + 2).
