Answer: $80 million per year for 25 years
Explanation:
The option you should choose is one that will guarantee you the highest present value.
This means that you need to discount the annual payment of $80 million per year for 25 years to find the present value. As you did not include a rate, we shall assume a rate of 8% for reference purposes.
The annual payment is an annuity so the present value can be calculated by:
Present value of annuity = Annuity payment * Present value interest factor, rate, no. of years
= 80,000,000 * Present value interest factor, 8%, 25 years
= 80,000,000 * 10.6748
= $853,984,000
<em>The present value of the annual payment is more than the present value of the $850 million received today so the Annual payment should be taken. </em>
The items that are initially recorded as an expense on the income statement are:
- a. Research and development costs
- b. Advertising costs
<h3>What is an Income Statement? </h3>
This refers to financial information that stores all the inflows and income that occurred over a period of time.
Hence, we can see that from the complete text, there are lists of items and the Research and development costs and Advertising costs are initially included as expenses in the income statement.
Read more about income statements here:
brainly.com/question/24498019
#SPJ11
Answer:
Explanation:
Firms still choose to go for an IPO for the following reasons;
1. Majorly, it is a means of generating revenue. Revenue is generated when stocks are sold to the public.
2. It is also a means of reducing risk, The cost of running the business is spread across many investors, so is the risk.
3. There is reduction of the overall cost of capital and gives the company a more solid standing when negotiating interest rates with banks.
4. Companies can easily offer up stocks instead of cash in the acquisition of other companies or in the case of mergers.
5. Having stocks listed on NSE is a means of public exposure
Investors choose to buy stocks of IPO firms because the initial offering is usually at a low rate since the firm is still small and relatively unknown. This stocks bought at a cheap rates have the chance of rising thus generating gains for the investors.
Answer:
Explanation below
Explanation:
When organizations are looking at hiring interns, they should make sure it does not go against the laws of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) which broadly defines what it means to employ someone and remained silent regarding whether interns should be exempted from minimum wages.
FLSA provides that if your company like that of Wayne in the question, benefits from the use of interns they hired, then they must pay them a sum that is equivalent to the minimum wage.
But if the intern does not do any work that directly benefits the organization, but just there to learn and watch how things are going, then it can be justified in not paying them at all.
so Wayne's rights have been violated since the wage was below the minimum wage.
Answer:
yes, however, it is legal if congress gives consent.
Explanation:
Article I, § 10, clause 2 of the United States Constitution, known as the Import-Export Clause, prevents the states, without the consent of Congress, from imposing tariffs on imports and exports above what is necessary for their inspection laws and secures for the federal government the revenues from all tariffs on imports and exports. Several nineteenth century Supreme Court cases applied this clause to duties and imposts on interstate imports and exports. In 1869, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the Import-Export Clause only applied to imports and exports with foreign nations and did not apply to imports and exports with other states, although this interpretation has been questioned by modern legal scholars.
