Answer:
The correct answer is C) Schenck v. the United States (1919)
Explanation:
The Schenck v. the United States (1919) case has great importance in the history of the country. Two activists, Elizabeth Baer and Charles Schenck were writing against the military draft.
They even distributed pamphlets discouraging people from joining the military and promoted a rebellion against forceful draft.
They were charged under the Espionage Act of 1917. In their defense, they stated how they were only practicing their right to free speech.
However, the Judge did not rule in their favour stating that a free speech is not protected under the first Amendment if it creates a 'clear and present danger'
Is solidified constitutionial reforms by creating the national assembly
Answer:
Some are against the patriot act because it allows the government to basically conduct searches on personal records and many other things if they suspect someone of being a terrorist, according to the ACLU it also "violates the constitution in several ways".
Explanation:
Answer:
As Laborie rightly states: 'Staring at the Enlightenment can be blinding ... This preference essentially coincides with that of the Enlightenment authors themselves. ... civility regardless of the doctrinal disputes that divided Christianity. ... Even when desired unity was conceived of as the triumph of one religion.
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer for question 1 is Option B -- Great Compromise. The answer for question 2 is option D -- James Madison.
