1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Blizzard [7]
3 years ago
5

If a lunar eclipse occurs tonight, the next lunar eclipse would occur?

Social Studies
1 answer:
liubo4ka [24]3 years ago
7 0
D. in one year, i’m pretty sure it’s d
You might be interested in
Government impersonation scams involve ________. running auctions that do not exist people pretending to represent official orga
CaHeK987 [17]

Answer:

Government impersonation scams involve "Malware Fraud".

Explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
What was the african national congress?
sukhopar [10]
African national Congress is the republic of South Africa's governing political party. It has been the ruling party of post apartheid South Africa on the nàtional level, beginning with the election of Nelson Mandela in the 1994' s election.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The colonies of New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware were all part of which colonial region? (4 points)
Ugo [173]
The middle colonies trust me on that ong
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In what way was John Brown a martyr?
GrogVix [38]

Answer:

<em>Hi! Deku here!</em>

Explanation:

He wanted to do good, but his own rage took over and took the good deed of bringing justice for all black people, and made it into a march of murder and evil. The only way to truly determine if John Brown was a martyr or a misguided fanatic is to decide what measures are acceptable to go to to accomplish something, and what measures are too much.

<em>hope this helps! <3</em>

6 0
3 years ago
Draw a conclusion, discussing the outcomes of the experiment, experimental uncertainties, and assumptions. Hint: Make sure you a
stepladder [879]

Answer:Sociological research is especially important with respect to public policy debates. The political controversies that surround the question of how best to respond to terrorism and violent crime are difficult to resolve at the level of political rhetoric. Often, in the news and in public discourse, the issue is framed in moral terms and therefore, for example, the policy alternatives get narrowed to the option of either being “tough” or “soft” on crime. Tough and soft are moral categories that reflect a moral characterization of the issue. A question framed by these types of moral categories cannot be resolved using evidence-based procedures. Posing the debate in these terms narrows the range of options available and undermines the ability to raise questions about what responses to crime actually work.

In fact policy debates over terrorism and crime seem especially susceptible to the various forms of specious, unscientific reasoning described later in this chapter. The story of the isolated individual, whose specific act of violence becomes the basis for the belief that the criminal justice system as a whole has failed, illustrates several qualities of unscientific thinking: knowledge based on casual observation, knowledge based on over-generalization, and knowledge based on selective evidence. The sociological approach to policy questions is essentially different since it focuses on examining the effectiveness of different social control strategies for addressing different types of violent behaviour and the different types of risk to public safety. Thus, from a sociological point of view, it is crucial to think systematically about who commits violent acts and why.

Although moral claims and opinions are of interest to sociologists, sociological researchers use empirical evidence (that is, evidence corroborated by direct experience and/or observation) combined with the scientific method to deliver sound sociological research. A truly scientific sociological study of the social causes that lead to terrorist or criminal violence would involve a sequence of prescribed steps: defining a specific research question that can be answered through empirical observation; gathering information and resources through detailed observation; forming a hypothesis; testing the hypothesis in a reproducible manner; analyzing and drawing conclusions from the data; publishing the results; and anticipating further development when future researchers respond to and re-examine the findings.

Explanation: The major factors responsible for these experimentations had earlier being revealed and portrayed.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Assuming that people act in rational ways, what psychological model of health behavior specifies several factors that determine
    12·1 answer
  • If stricter immigration laws are imposed and many foreign workers in the United States are forced to go back to their home count
    12·1 answer
  • How are congress and the president involved in the armed forces?
    6·2 answers
  • How could the adaption of valves in leg vains allow a human to better survive in its environment.
    6·1 answer
  • As a college student, Lewis organized sit-ins at lunch counters in Tennessee. In a sit-in, activists protest by occupying a spac
    13·1 answer
  • Many enlightenment ideas were incorporated into
    13·1 answer
  • What is a course of action or strategy that may be chosen by a decision​ maker?
    13·1 answer
  • Individual members of Congress cannot become experts on each of the thousands of bills proposed each year, so Congress relies on
    10·1 answer
  • Why were strong words important to the founding fathers?
    10·1 answer
  • Can somebody pls help me nobody will answer this &lt;3 brainly if correct
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!