<span>This is an example of the self-fulfilling prophecy. This prophecy is a prediction that directly or indirectly causes itself to become true, by the very terms of the prophecy itself, due to positive feedback between belief and behavior.</span>
The organizational framework that shows that one or two or more alternatives is best is the <u>comparative advantages</u> framework.
<h3>What Is Comparative Advantage?</h3>
Comparative advantage is the ability of an economy to produce a particular good or service at a lower opportunity cost than its trading counterparts. Comparative advantage is used to explain why companies, countries or individuals can profit from trade.
When used to describe international trade, comparative advantage refers to products that one country can produce more cheaply or more easily than other countries. Although this generally illustrates the benefits of trade, some contemporary economists now recognize that focusing solely on comparative advantage can lead to the exploitation and depletion of resources. country.
To learn more about comparative advantage from given link
brainly.com/question/2827889
#SPJ4
The most likely determination of the location of Beghdad in Iraq was the proximity to the Tigris River.
Classical and operant conditioning are two basic concepts in behavioral psychology. They both describe the learning process, but from different angles. In order to understand how each of these methods of behavior modification can be used, it is also important to understand how they differ.
Classical conditioning:
- It was first described by Ivan Pavlovym, a Russian physiologist;
- It implies a neutral stimulus to the reflex;
- It is oriented to involuntary, automatic actions.
Operand conditioning:
- It was first described by B. F. Skinner, an American psychologist;
- It includes the use of reinforcements or punishments after demonstrating behavior;
- It is aimed at reinforcement of the controlled behavior.
One of the simplest ways to find the difference between the classical and the operant is to analyze the behavior and to understand whether it is conscious or subconscious. Classical teaching implies the creation of an association between stimulus and involuntary reaction, while the operand takes into account the connection between consciously controlled behavior and its consequences.
There is no doubt in my mind that today, 30 years later, we still have Theory X managers. According with McGregor Theory X, managers tend to have a negative, pessimistic view of employees and display more coercive, autocratic leadership styles using external means of controls, such as threats and punishment.
<h3>
What do you understand by theory of x managers?</h3>
Theory X managers frequently have a gloomy outlook on their workforce, assuming that they are naturally disengaged and disliking of their jobs. People are frequently motivated using a "carrot and stick" strategy, which can lead to repetitious work in firms run in this way.
Douglas McGregor developed the theories known as Theory X and Theory Y in 1960. These theories propose two aspects of human behavior at work, or, to put it another way, two opposing perspectives on people (employees): one is negative and is known as Theory X, and the other is positive and is known as Theory Y.
To learn more about theory of x managers, Visit: brainly.com/question/13187309
#SPJ4
