Adaptive selling and consultative selling are the two common types of the need-satisfaction presentation format.
<h3>
What is adaptive selling and consultative selling?</h3>
Every person is unique, as are the circumstances surrounding the sale of any product. A selling technique that is used according to the situation that is all customized by involving or adapting to the customer's communication style is known as adaptive selling.
In the consultative selling technique, the focus of the salesman is not on the number of products that are being sold out. The main focus is on the availability of solutions that are tailored to the customer's needs. In this type of selling, a salesman learns more about a customer's needs in a better and more effective way.
Therefore, adaptive selling and consultative selling are the two common types of the need satisfaction presentation format.
Learn more about adaptive selling from here:
brainly.com/question/14264690
#SPJ1
Answer:
okk sweetspotmaster is the ............
sorry I don't know him can you tell me about him who is he?
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": full-time job that one could have gotten instead of going to college.
Explanation:
Opportunity costs can be defined as the return of the chosen option compared to the options forgone. Opportunity costs represent also the return of the best next available option after the option selected. Opportunity costs can be positive or negative which implies the option chosen was not the most optimal.
In this case,<em> the opportunity cost of going to college after finishing school is represented by starting to work in a full-time job to earn money.</em>
Answer: comparative advantages
Explanation:
Comparative advantages order refers to a method of organizing persuasive speeches whereby the speaker gives points on how the solution to a particular problem is preferable than other solutions that are proposed l.
It is a way of structuring a persuasive speech when the audience knows that there's a challenge regarding a particular thing but wants to be convinced that a particular plan is the best solution when compared to other plans.
In this case, since the speaker is trying to tell the audience that carbon tax is a better solution than an emission trading system to the problem of industrial pollution, then this is referred to as comparative advantage order.